TY - JOUR
T1 - Psychosocial well-being and supportive care needs of cancer patients and survivors living in rural or regional areas: a systematic review from 2010 to 2021
AU - van der Kruk, S.R.
AU - Butow, P.
AU - Mesters, I.
AU - Boyle, T.
AU - Olver, I.
AU - White, K.
AU - Sabesan, S.
AU - Zielinski, R.
AU - Chan, B.A.
AU - Spronk, K.
AU - Grimison, P.
AU - Underhill, C.
AU - Kirsten, L.
AU - Gunn, K.M.
AU - Clinical Oncological Society of Australia
PY - 2022/2
Y1 - 2022/2
N2 - Purpose To summarise what is currently known about the psychosocial morbidity, experiences, and needs of people with cancer and their informal caregivers, who live in rural or regional areas of developed countries. Methods Eligible studies dating from August 2010 until May 2021 were identified through several online databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, and RURAL (Rural and Remote Health Database). Results were reported according to the PRISMA guidelines and the protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020171764). Results Sixty-five studies were included in this review, including 20 qualitative studies, 41 quantitative studies, and 4 mixed methods studies. Qualitative research demonstrated that many unique psychosocial needs of rural people remain unmet, particularly relating to finances, travel, and accessing care. However, most (9/19) quantitative studies that compared rural and urban groups reported no significant differences in psychosocial needs, morbidity, or quality of life (QOL). Five quantitative studies reported poorer psychosocial outcomes (social and emotional functioning) in urban cancer survivors, while three highlighted poorer outcomes (physical functioning, role functioning, and self-reported mental health outcomes) in the rural group. Conclusion Recent research shows that rural people affected by cancer have unique unmet psychosocial needs relating to rurality. However, there was little evidence that rural cancer survivors report greater unmet needs than their urban counterparts. This contrasts to the findings from a 2011 systematic review that found rural survivors consistently reported worse psychosocial outcomes. More population-based research is needed to establish whether uniquely rural unmet needs are due to general or cancer-specific factors.
AB - Purpose To summarise what is currently known about the psychosocial morbidity, experiences, and needs of people with cancer and their informal caregivers, who live in rural or regional areas of developed countries. Methods Eligible studies dating from August 2010 until May 2021 were identified through several online databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, and RURAL (Rural and Remote Health Database). Results were reported according to the PRISMA guidelines and the protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020171764). Results Sixty-five studies were included in this review, including 20 qualitative studies, 41 quantitative studies, and 4 mixed methods studies. Qualitative research demonstrated that many unique psychosocial needs of rural people remain unmet, particularly relating to finances, travel, and accessing care. However, most (9/19) quantitative studies that compared rural and urban groups reported no significant differences in psychosocial needs, morbidity, or quality of life (QOL). Five quantitative studies reported poorer psychosocial outcomes (social and emotional functioning) in urban cancer survivors, while three highlighted poorer outcomes (physical functioning, role functioning, and self-reported mental health outcomes) in the rural group. Conclusion Recent research shows that rural people affected by cancer have unique unmet psychosocial needs relating to rurality. However, there was little evidence that rural cancer survivors report greater unmet needs than their urban counterparts. This contrasts to the findings from a 2011 systematic review that found rural survivors consistently reported worse psychosocial outcomes. More population-based research is needed to establish whether uniquely rural unmet needs are due to general or cancer-specific factors.
KW - Cancer
KW - Rural
KW - Psychosocial
KW - Healthcare needs
KW - Informal caregivers
KW - Oncology
KW - QUALITY-OF-LIFE
KW - MENTAL-HEALTH RESOURCES
KW - BREAST-CANCER
KW - UNMET NEEDS
KW - COLORECTAL-CANCER
KW - AUSTRALIAN WOMEN
KW - SERVICE USE
KW - URBAN
KW - DISTRESS
KW - OUTCOMES
U2 - 10.1007/s00520-021-06440-1
DO - 10.1007/s00520-021-06440-1
M3 - (Systematic) Review article
C2 - 34392413
SN - 0941-4355
VL - 30
SP - 1021
EP - 1064
JO - Supportive Care in Cancer
JF - Supportive Care in Cancer
IS - 2
ER -