Psychosis as a confounder of symptom credibility testing in a transcultural sample

Douwe Van der Heide*, Irena Boskovic, Peter Van Harten, Harald Merckelbach

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

8 Citations (Web of Science)
10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

To check the credibility of impairments reported by refugees, so-called performance validity tests may be administered. We explored whether a psychotic condition may compromise performance on such test in patients admitted to a referral center for refugee mental health in the Netherlands (n = 231). We selected patients with no clear incentive to exaggerate their complaints (n = 80); psychotic patients in this subsample (n = 44) made significantly more errors on a simple forced-choice emotion recognition task than non-psychotic patients (n = 36), means being 9.0 (SD = 6.8) and 5.9 (SD = 5.1), respectively. Next, we selected patients with an incentive to deny complaints (n = 24); 79% of these patients had a psychotic disorder. Their failure rate on the emotion recognition test (21%) was the same as the failure rate of a control group of Dutch chronic psychotic patients (n = 47), but significantly above that (2%) of a control group of healthy controls (n = 51). We regard this as preliminary evidence that psychotic symptoms and/or antipsychotic medication may put a constraint on testing symptom credibility in refugees.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)64-75
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology
Volume31
Issue number1
Early online date8 Sep 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2020

Keywords

  • Symptom validity
  • transcultural psychiatry
  • symptom exaggeration
  • underperformance
  • PERFORMANCE VALIDITY
  • ASYLUM SEEKERS
  • SCHIZOPHRENIA
  • VALIDATION
  • MEMORY
  • RATES

Cite this