Psychiatric diagnosis revisited - from DSM to clinical case formulation

Jim van Os*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This book explores the purpose of clinical psychological and psychiatric diagnosis, and provides a persuasive case for moving away from the traditional practice of psychiatric classification. It discusses the validity and reliability of classification-based approaches to clinical diagnosis, and frames them in their broader historical and societal context. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) is used across the world in research and a range of mental health settings; here, Stijn Vanheule argues that the diagnostic reliability of the DSM is overrated, built on a limited biomedical approach to mental disorders that neglects context, and ultimately breeds stigma. The book subsequently makes a passionate plea for a more detailed approach to the study of mental suffering by means of case formulation. Starting from literature on qualitative research the author makes clear how to guarantee the quality of clinical case formulations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)191-192
Number of pages2
JournalPsychosis-Psychological Social and Integrative Approaches
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Psychiatric diagnosis revisited - from DSM to clinical case formulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this