TY - JOUR
T1 - Promoting physical activity in children: The stepwise development of the primary school-based JUMP-in intervention applying the RE-AIM evaluation framework.
AU - de Meij, J.S.
AU - Chinapaw, M.J.M.
AU - Kremers, S.P.
AU - van der Wal, M.F.
AU - Jurg, M.M.
AU - van Mechelen, W.
PY - 2010/1/1
Y1 - 2010/1/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: There is a lack of effective intervention strategies that promote physical activity (PA) in school children. Furthermore, there is a gap between PA intervention research and the delivery of programmes in practice. Evaluation studies seldomly lead to adaptations in interventions which are subsequently evaluated on a wider scale implementation. The stepwise development and study of JUMP-in aims to add knowledge to better understand how, when and for whom intervention effects (or lack of effects) occur. METHODS: This paper describes the stepwise development of JUMP-in, a Dutch school based multi- level intervention programme, aimed at the promotion of PA behaviour in 6 to 12-year-old children. JUMP-in incorporates education, sports, care and policy components. JUMP-in consists of six programme components: 1. Pupil Follow Up Monitoring System; 2. School sports clubs; 3. In-class exercises with "The Class Moves!"; 4. Personal workbook "This is the way you move!"; 5. Parental Information services; 6. Extra lessons physical education, Motor Remedial Teaching and extra care. The process- and effect outcomes of a pilot study were translated into an improved programme and intervention organisation, using the RE-AIM framework (Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance). This paper presents the process and results of the application of this framework, which resulted in a wide-scale implementation of JUMP-in. RESULTS: The application of the RE-AIM framework resulted in challenges and remedies for an improved JUMP-in intervention. The remedies required changes at three different levels: 1. the content of the programme components; 2. the organisation and programme management; and 3. the evaluation design. CONCLUSIONS: Considering factors that determine the impact of PA interventions in 'real life' is of great importance. The RE-AIM framework appeared to be a useful guide in which process- and effect outcomes could be translated into an improved programme content and organisation.
AB - BACKGROUND: There is a lack of effective intervention strategies that promote physical activity (PA) in school children. Furthermore, there is a gap between PA intervention research and the delivery of programmes in practice. Evaluation studies seldomly lead to adaptations in interventions which are subsequently evaluated on a wider scale implementation. The stepwise development and study of JUMP-in aims to add knowledge to better understand how, when and for whom intervention effects (or lack of effects) occur. METHODS: This paper describes the stepwise development of JUMP-in, a Dutch school based multi- level intervention programme, aimed at the promotion of PA behaviour in 6 to 12-year-old children. JUMP-in incorporates education, sports, care and policy components. JUMP-in consists of six programme components: 1. Pupil Follow Up Monitoring System; 2. School sports clubs; 3. In-class exercises with "The Class Moves!"; 4. Personal workbook "This is the way you move!"; 5. Parental Information services; 6. Extra lessons physical education, Motor Remedial Teaching and extra care. The process- and effect outcomes of a pilot study were translated into an improved programme and intervention organisation, using the RE-AIM framework (Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance). This paper presents the process and results of the application of this framework, which resulted in a wide-scale implementation of JUMP-in. RESULTS: The application of the RE-AIM framework resulted in challenges and remedies for an improved JUMP-in intervention. The remedies required changes at three different levels: 1. the content of the programme components; 2. the organisation and programme management; and 3. the evaluation design. CONCLUSIONS: Considering factors that determine the impact of PA interventions in 'real life' is of great importance. The RE-AIM framework appeared to be a useful guide in which process- and effect outcomes could be translated into an improved programme content and organisation.
U2 - 10.1136/bjsm.2008.053827
DO - 10.1136/bjsm.2008.053827
M3 - Article
SN - 0306-3674
VL - 44
SP - 879
EP - 887
JO - British Journal of Sports Medicine
JF - British Journal of Sports Medicine
IS - 12
ER -