Les progrès dans la réalisation de la classification quantitative de la psychopathologie

Translated title of the contribution: Progress in achieving quantitative classification of psychopathology

R.F. Krueger*, R. Kotov, D. Watson, M.K. Forbes, N.R. Eaton, C.J. Ruggero, L.J. Simms, T.A. Widiger, T.M. Achenbach, B. Bach, R.M. Bagby, M.A. Bornovalova, W.T. Carpenter, M. Chmielewski, D.C. Cicero, L.A. Clark, C. Conway, B. DeClercqq, C.G. DeYoung, A.R. DochertyL.E. Drislane, M.B. First, K.T. Forbush, M. Hallquist, J.D. Haltigan, C.J. Hopwood, M.Y. Ivanova, K.G. Jonas, R.D. Latzman, K.E. Markon, J.D. Miller, L.C. Morey, S.N. Mullins-Sweatt, J. Ormel, P. Patalay, C.J. Patrick, A.L. Pincus, D.A. Regier, U. Reininghaus, L.A. Rescorla, D.B. Samuel, M. Sellbom, A.J. Shackman, A. Skodol, T. Slade, S.C. South, M. Sunderland, J.L. Tackett, N.C. Venables, I.D. Waldman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review


Shortcomings of approaches to classifying psychopathology based on expert consensus have given rise to contemporary efforts to classify psychopathology quantitatively. In this paper, we review progress in achieving a quantitative and empirical classification of psychopathology. A substantial empirical literature indicates that psychopathology is generally more dimensional than categorical. When the discreteness versus continuity of psychopathology is treated as a research question, as opposed to being decided as a matter of tradition, the evidence clearly supports the hypothesis of continuity. In addition, a related body of literature shows how psychopathology dimensions can be arranged in a hierarchy, ranging from very broad "spectrum level'' dimensions, to specific and narrow clusters of symptoms. In this way, a quantitative approach solves the "problem of comorbidity'' by explicitly modeling patterns of co-occurrence among signs and symptoms within a detailed and variegated hierarchy of dimensional concepts with direct clinical utility. Indeed, extensive evidence pertaining to the dimensional and hierarchical structure of psychopathology has led to the formation of the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) Consortium. This is a group of 70 investigators working together to study empirical classification of psychopathology. In this paper, we describe the aims and current foci of the HiTOP Consortium. These aims pertain to continued research on the empirical organization of psychopathology; the connection between personality and psychopathology; the utility of empirically based psychopathology constructs in both research and the clinic; and the development of novel and comprehensive models and corresponding assessment instruments for psychopathology constructs derived from an empirical approach. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.
Translated title of the contributionProgress in achieving quantitative classification of psychopathology
Original languageFrench
Pages (from-to)95-106
Number of pages12
JournalAnnales Medico-Psychologiques
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2021


  • classification
  • clinical utility
  • dimensions
  • dsm
  • emotional disorders
  • externalizing psychopathology
  • hierarchical structure
  • hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology
  • icd
  • mental disorder
  • meta-structure
  • model
  • nosology
  • personality
  • personality-disorder
  • psychopathology
  • rdoc
  • substance use
  • symptoms
  • taxometric evidence
  • validity
  • RDoC
  • Nosology
  • Classification
  • Psychopathology
  • DSM
  • Dimensions
  • Personality
  • ICD
  • Clinical utility
  • Mental disorder
  • Hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology

Cite this