Prognostic Value of High-Sensitivity Troponin T in Chronic Heart Failure An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis

Alberto Aimo, James L. Januzzi, Giuseppe Vergaro, Andrea Ripoli, Roberto Latini, Serge Masson, Michela Magnoli, Inder S. Anand, Jay N. Cohn, Luigi Tavazzi, Gianni Tognoni, Jorgen Gravning, Thor Ueland, Stale H. Nymo, Hans-Peter Brunner-La Rocca, Antoni Bayes Genis, Josep Lupon, Rudolf A. de Boer, Akiomi Yoshihisa, Yasuchika TakeishiMichael Egstrup, Ida Gustafsson, Hanna K. Gaggin, Kai M. Eggers, Kurt Huber, Ioannis Tentzeris, Wai H. W. Tang, Justin Grodin, Claudio Passino, Michele Emdin*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal(Systematic) Review article peer-review

134 Citations (Web of Science)


BACKGROUND: Most patients with chronic heart failure have detectable troponin concentrations when evaluated by high-sensitivity assays. The prognostic relevance of this finding has not been clearly established so far. We aimed to assess high-sensitivity troponin assay for risk stratification in chronic heart failure through a meta-analysis approach. METHODS: Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus were searched in April 2017 by 2 independent authors. The terms were "troponin" AND "heart failure" OR "cardiac failure" OR "cardiac dysfunction" OR "cardiac insufficiency" OR "left ventricular dysfunction." Inclusion criteria were English language, clinical stability, use of a high-sensitivity troponin assay, follow-up studies, and availability of individual patient data after request to authors. Data retrieved from articles and provided by authors were used in agreement with the PRISMA statement. The end points were all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and hospitalization for cardiovascular cause. RESULTS: Ten studies were included, reporting data on 11 cohorts and 9289 patients (age 6612 years, 77% men, 60% ischemic heart failure, 85% with left ventricular ejection fraction <40%). High-sensitivity troponin T data were available for all patients, whereas only 209 patients also had high-sensitivity troponin I assayed. When added to a prognostic model including established risk markers (sex, age, ischemic versus nonischemic etiology, left ventricular ejection fraction, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and N-terminal fraction of pro-B-type natriuretic peptide), high-sensitivity troponin T remained independently associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.41-1.55), cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% confidence interval, 1.33-1.48), and cardiovascular hospitalization (hazard ratio, 1.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.36-1.49), over a median 2.4-year follow-up (all P<0.001). High-sensitivity troponin T significantly improved risk prediction when added to a prognostic model including the variables above. It also displayed an independent prognostic value for all outcomes in almost all population subgroups. The area under the curve-derived 18 ng/L cutoff yielded independent prognostic value for the 3 end points in both men and women, patients with either ischemic or nonischemic etiology, and across categories of renal dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: In chronic heart failure, high-sensitivity troponin T is a strong and independent predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, and of hospitalization for cardiovascular causes, as well. This biomarker then represents an additional tool for prognostic stratification.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)286-297
Number of pages12
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 16 Jan 2018


  • heart failure
  • meta-analysis
  • prognosis
  • troponin T
  • ventricular dysfunction, left

Cite this