Process evaluation of a reablement training program for homecare staff to encourage independence in community-dwelling older adults

T.H. Rooijackers*, G.A.R. Zijlstra, E. van Rossum, R.G.M. Vogel, M.Y. Veenstra, G.I.J.M. Kempen, S.F. Metzelthin

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

9 Citations (Web of Science)

Abstract

BackgroundMany community-dwelling older adults experience limitations in (instrumental) activities of daily living, resulting in the need for homecare services. Whereas services should ideally aim at maintaining independence, homecare staff often take over activities, thereby undermining older adults' self-care skills and jeopardizing their ability to continue living at home. Reablement is an innovative care approach aimed at optimizing independence. The reablement training program 'Stay Active at Home' for homecare staff was designed to support the implementation of reablement in the delivery of homecare services. This study evaluated the implementation, mechanisms of impact and context of the program.MethodsWe conducted a process evaluation alongside a 12-month cluster randomized controlled trial, using an embedded mixed-methods design. One hundred fifty-four homecare staff members (23 nurses, 34 nurse assistants, 8 nurse aides and 89 domestic workers) from five working areas received the program. Data on the implementation (reach, dose, fidelity, adaptations and acceptability), possible mechanisms of impact (homecare staff's knowledge, attitude, skills and support) and context were collected using logbooks, registration forms, checklists, log data and focus group interviews with homecare staff (n=23) and program trainers (n=4).ResultsThe program was largely implemented as intended. Homecare staff's average compliance to the program meetings was 73.4%; staff members accepted the program, and particularly valued its practical elements and team approach. They experienced positive changes in their knowledge, attitude and skills about reablement, and perceived social and organizational support from colleagues and team managers to implement reablement. However, the extent to which homecare staff implemented reablement in practice, varied. Perceived facilitators included digital care plans, the organization's lump sum funding and newly referred clients. Perceived barriers included resistance to change from clients or their social network, complex care situations, time pressure and staff shortages.ConclusionsThe program was feasible to implement in the Dutch homecare setting, and was perceived as useful in daily practice. Nevertheless, integrating reablement into homecare staff's working practices remained challenging due to various personal and contextual factors. Future implementation of the program may benefit from minor program adaptations and a more stimulating work environment.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT03293303). Registered 26 September 2017.
Original languageEnglish
Article number5
Number of pages15
JournalBMC Geriatrics
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Jan 2021

Keywords

  • Activities of daily living
  • Behavior and behavior mechanisms
  • Home and community based care and services
  • Independence
  • Process evaluation
  • Reablement
  • Self-care
  • Training program
  • activities of daily living
  • behavior and behavior mechanisms
  • home and community based care and services
  • independence
  • process evaluation
  • reablement
  • self-care
  • training program
  • MIXED METHODS
  • FEASIBILITY
  • SERVICES
  • CARE
  • HEALTH

Cite this