Process evaluation of a diversity training program: The value of a mixed method strategy

Halime Celik; Tineke A. Abma; Ineke Klinge; Guy A. M. Widdershoven

doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.07.001

Process evaluation of a diversity training program: The value of a mixed method strategy

Halime Celik, Tineke A. Abma, Ineke Klinge, Guy A. M. Widdershoven

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	54-65
Journal	Evaluation and Program Planning
Volume	35
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.07.001
Publication status	Published - Feb 2012

Keywords

Gender
Diversity
Implementation
Training
Process evaluation
Mixed-methods

Access to Document

10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.07.001

Cite this

@article{ed091aa191d94cb1a9534ef0317fe116,

title = "Process evaluation of a diversity training program: The value of a mixed method strategy",

keywords = "Gender, Diversity, Implementation, Training, Process evaluation, Mixed-methods",

author = "Halime Celik and Abma, {Tineke A.} and Ineke Klinge and Widdershoven, {Guy A. M.}",

year = "2012",

month = feb,

doi = "10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.07.001",

language = "English",

volume = "35",

pages = "54--65",

journal = "Evaluation and Program Planning",

issn = "0149-7189",

publisher = "Elsevier Science",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Process evaluation of a diversity training program: The value of a mixed method strategy

AU - Celik, Halime

AU - Abma, Tineke A.

AU - Klinge, Ineke

AU - Widdershoven, Guy A. M.

PY - 2012/2

Y1 - 2012/2

KW - Gender

KW - Diversity

KW - Implementation

KW - Training

KW - Process evaluation

KW - Mixed-methods

U2 - 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.07.001

DO - 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.07.001

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 54

EP - 65

JO - Evaluation and Program Planning

JF - Evaluation and Program Planning

SN - 0149-7189

IS - 1

ER -