Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Pregnancy rate following normal versus abnormal hysterosalpingography findings: A meta-analysis

  • JWM Maas*
  • , JLH Evers
  • , G Riet
  • , AGH Kessels
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

A computerized Medline search was conducted, to assess the prognostic value of hysterosalpingography (HSG) and the probability of pregnancy after normal versus abnormal HSG findings. A total of 13 studies turned out to be eligible, reporting on 3,277 women. 15% of women with an abnormal HSG and 32% of women with a normal HSG achieved pregnancy. Sensitivities and specificities of the studies were heterogeneous. The pooled odds ratio was 3 (95% CI: 2.3-3.4). Its ROC Curve shows that, at the operating point yielding the lowest number of misclassifications, a sensitivity of 63% and a specificity of 62% is achieved. Seven studies reported unilateral and bilateral obstruction. Odds ratios were 2 (95% CI: 1.5-2.6) and 19 (95% CI: 7.5-46.5) respectively. So, overall, HSG has a low prognostic value, the outcome of HSG adds little to predicting the occurrence of pregnancy. However, when HSG shows bilateral obstruction, the chance of getting pregnant is only minimal.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)79-83
Number of pages5
JournalGynecologic and obstetric investigation
Volume43
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1997

Keywords

  • Hysterosalpingography
  • Infertility
  • Meta-analysis
  • Pregnancy rate
  • Prognostic value

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pregnancy rate following normal versus abnormal hysterosalpingography findings: A meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this