Abstract
Injectable antiretroviral treatment (ART) represents a new effective and potentially more convenient alternative to oral ART for people living with HIV (PLWH). This study assessed preferences of PLWH for long-acting injectable compared with oral ART in the Netherlands. A labelled discrete choice experiment presented 12 choice sets of long-acting injectable and oral ART. PLWH were asked to select their preferred ART, described by six attributes: location of administration, dosing frequency, risk of short-term side effects, drug-drug interaction, forgivability, and food and mealtime restrictions. Random parameters logit and latent class models were used to estimate preferences of PLWH. 98.6% of 76 respondents were experienced oral ART users that had taken ART for a median of 12 years (Q1-Q3: 7.0-20.0). 30 (39.5%) respondents chose long-acting injectable ART in all choice tasks and 22 (28.9%) always chose oral ART. The random parameter model showed that, on average, respondents significantly favoured long-acting injectable ART over oral ART, preferred administration of the long-acting injectable ART at home, and a less frequent regimen. The latent class model confirmed one class strongly preferring long-acting injectable ART and one class slightly preferring oral ART. This study highlights the value for both long-acting injectable and oral ART.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 536-545 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Aids Care-Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of Aids/Hiv |
Volume | 36 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | Jul 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2024 |
Keywords
- Antiretroviral therapy
- discrete choice experiment
- long-acting injectable
- oral therapy
- people living with HIV
- preferences
- >
- HEALTH