Prediction of Radiotherapy Compliance in Elderly Cancer Patients Using an Internally Validated Decision Tree

Biche Osong, Inigo Bermejo, Kyu Chan Lee, Seok Ho Lee*, Andre Dekker, Johan van Soest

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the relationship between the available variables and treatment compliance in elderly cancer patients treated with radiotherapy and to establish a decision tree model to guide caregivers in their decision-making process. For this purpose, 456 patients over 74 years of age who received radiotherapy between 2005 and 2017 were included in this retrospective analysis. The outcome of interest was radiotherapy compliance, determined by whether patients completed their scheduled radiotherapy treatment (compliance means they completed their treatment and noncompliance means they did not). A bootstrap (B = 400) technique was implemented to select the best tuning parameters to establish the decision tree. The developed decision tree uses patient status, the Charlson comorbidity index, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance scale, age, sex, cancer type, health insurance status, radiotherapy aim, and fractionation type (conventional fractionation versus hypofractionation) to distinguish between compliant and noncompliant patients. The decision tree's mean area under the curve and 95% confidence interval was 0.71 (0.66-0.77). Although external validation is needed to determine the decision tree's clinical usefulness, its discriminating ability was moderate and it could serve as an aid for caregivers to select the optimal treatment for elderly cancer patients.

Original languageEnglish
Article number6116
Number of pages13
JournalCancers
Volume14
Issue number24
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Dec 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prediction of Radiotherapy Compliance in Elderly Cancer Patients Using an Internally Validated Decision Tree'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this