TY - JOUR
T1 - Predicting glycated hemoglobin levels in the non-diabetic general population
T2 - Development and validation of the DIRECT - DETECT prediction model - a DIRECT study
AU - Rauh, Simone P.
AU - Heymans, Martijn W.
AU - Koopman, Anitra D. M.
AU - Nijpels, Giel
AU - Stehouwer, Coen D.
AU - Thorand, Barbara
AU - Rathmann, Wolfgang
AU - Meisinger, Christa
AU - Peters, Annette
AU - Gala, Tonia de las Heras
AU - Glumer, Charlotte
AU - Pedersen, Oluf
AU - Cederberg, Henna
AU - Kuusisto, Johanna
AU - Laakso, Markku
AU - Pearson, Ewan R.
AU - Franks, Paul W.
AU - Rutters, Femke
AU - Dekker, Jacqueline M.
PY - 2017/2/10
Y1 - 2017/2/10
N2 - Aims/hypothesisTo develop a prediction model that can predict HbA1 c levels after six years in the non-diabetic general population, including previously used readily available predictors.MethodsData from 5,762 initially non-diabetic subjects from three population-based cohorts (Hoorn Study, Inter99, KORA 54/F4) were combined to predict HbAl c levels at six year follow-up. Using backward selection, age, BMI, waist circumference, use of anti-hypertensive medication, current smoking and parental history of diabetes remained in sex-specific linear regression models. To minimize overfitting of coefficients, we performed internal validation using bootstrapping techniques. Explained variance, discrimination and calibration were assessed using R-2, classification tables (comparing highest/lowest 50% HbA1 c levels) and calibration graphs. The model was externally validated in 2,765 non-diabetic subjects of the population-based cohort METSIM.ResultsAt baseline, mean HbAlc level was 5.6% (38 mmol/mol). After a mean follow-up of six years, mean HbAlc level was 5.7% (39 mmol/mol). Calibration graphs showed that predicted HbA1c levels were somewhat underestimated in the Inter99 cohort and overestimated in the Hoorn and KORA cohorts, indicating that the model's intercept should be adjusted for each cohort to improve predictions. Sensitivity and specificity (95% CI) were 55.7% (53.9, 57.5) and 56.9% (55.1, 58.7) respectively, for women, and 54.6% (52.7, 56.5) and 54.3% (52.4, 56.2) for men. External validation showed similar performance in the METSIM cohort.Conclusions/interpretationIn the non-diabetic population, our DIRECT-DETECT prediction model, including readily available predictors, has a relatively low explained variance and moderate discriminative performance, but can help to distinguish between future highest and lowest HbA1c levels. Absolute HbA1c values are cohort-dependent.
AB - Aims/hypothesisTo develop a prediction model that can predict HbA1 c levels after six years in the non-diabetic general population, including previously used readily available predictors.MethodsData from 5,762 initially non-diabetic subjects from three population-based cohorts (Hoorn Study, Inter99, KORA 54/F4) were combined to predict HbAl c levels at six year follow-up. Using backward selection, age, BMI, waist circumference, use of anti-hypertensive medication, current smoking and parental history of diabetes remained in sex-specific linear regression models. To minimize overfitting of coefficients, we performed internal validation using bootstrapping techniques. Explained variance, discrimination and calibration were assessed using R-2, classification tables (comparing highest/lowest 50% HbA1 c levels) and calibration graphs. The model was externally validated in 2,765 non-diabetic subjects of the population-based cohort METSIM.ResultsAt baseline, mean HbAlc level was 5.6% (38 mmol/mol). After a mean follow-up of six years, mean HbAlc level was 5.7% (39 mmol/mol). Calibration graphs showed that predicted HbA1c levels were somewhat underestimated in the Inter99 cohort and overestimated in the Hoorn and KORA cohorts, indicating that the model's intercept should be adjusted for each cohort to improve predictions. Sensitivity and specificity (95% CI) were 55.7% (53.9, 57.5) and 56.9% (55.1, 58.7) respectively, for women, and 54.6% (52.7, 56.5) and 54.3% (52.4, 56.2) for men. External validation showed similar performance in the METSIM cohort.Conclusions/interpretationIn the non-diabetic population, our DIRECT-DETECT prediction model, including readily available predictors, has a relatively low explained variance and moderate discriminative performance, but can help to distinguish between future highest and lowest HbA1c levels. Absolute HbA1c values are cohort-dependent.
KW - TYPE-2 DIABETES RISK
KW - HISPANIC WHITE ADULTS
KW - KORA S4/F4 COHORT
KW - LIFE-STYLE
KW - INSULIN SENSITIVITY
KW - CAUCASIAN POPULATION
KW - GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE
KW - FOLLOW-UP
KW - METAANALYSIS
KW - MELLITUS
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0171816
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0171816
M3 - Article
C2 - 28187151
VL - 12
JO - PLOS ONE
JF - PLOS ONE
SN - 1932-6203
IS - 2
M1 - 0171816
ER -