Abstract
This PhD research explores predatory publishing through a multi-layered lens, combining conceptual analysis with practical interventions. Across countries and disciplines, definitions of predatory journals show surprising consistency, yet awareness and responses remain uneven. Developing regions often lead advocacy, while high-income countries lag despite significant involvement. Competitive medical fields, under academic pressure, appear particularly vulnerable. Although the direct scientific impact may seem limited, flawed studies risk entering reviews, shaping guidelines, and influencing practice. The ASGLOS global survey highlighted generational differences and the value of mentorship, while a Delphi-validated educational video demonstrated education’s role in safeguarding scholarly integrity.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Qualification | Doctor of Philosophy |
| Awarding Institution |
|
| Supervisors/Advisors |
|
| Award date | 3 Oct 2025 |
| Place of Publication | Maastricht |
| Publisher | |
| Print ISBNs | 9789465108445 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 3 Oct 2025 |
Keywords
- Predatory publishing
- Ethics
- Medical education
- Accountability in research