Postoperative changes in CPAK-classification do not significantly influence patient-reported outcome measures following conventional or robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: A randomised controlled trial

  • Peter Bollars*
  • , Hans Feyen
  • , Dinesh Nathwani
  • , Ali Albelooshi
  • , Max Ettinger
  • , Ronny De Corte
  • , Martijn G. M. Schotanus
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of pre- and postoperative changes in Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and to determine the rate of CPAK classification change in patients undergoing either conventionally aligned total knee arthroplasty (CTKA) or imageless robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RATKA). We hypothesised that PROM improvements would be comparable regardless of whether postoperative CPAK classification was preserved ("In-the-box") or altered ("Out-of-the-box") in both surgical techniques.MethodsIn this prospective randomised controlled trial, 180 patients were assigned to either CTKA or RATKA. CPAK classification was assessed pre- and postoperatively. PROMs were collected at baseline, 3, and 12 months postoperatively, including the Knee Society Score, Oxford Knee Score, visual analog scale (VAS) for daytime and night time pain, EuroQol-5D (index and VAS), and patient satisfaction.ResultsBaseline characteristics were similar between groups. Native CPAK classification was preserved in 31% of CTKA and 41% of RATKA patients. Postoperatively, CPAK II was most common (40% CTKA and 49% RATKA), followed by CPAK V. Both groups showed significant improvements in all PROMs at 3- and 12-months, regardless of CPAK classification change, and operative technique.ConclusionsShort-term functional outcomes following TKA were not significantly influenced by In-the-box or Out-of-the box CPAK classification. Both CTKA and RATKA yielded comparable PROM improvements. Although altered CPAK often required greater soft-tissue release, especially in CTKA, this did not affect outcomes, suggesting alignment strategy should prioritise individual anatomy and soft-tissue balance over strict CPAK matching.Level of EvidenceLevel I.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3333-3340
Number of pages8
JournalKnee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy
Volume33
Issue number9
Early online date1 Jul 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2025

Keywords

  • conventional arthroplasty
  • coronal Plane alignment of the knee
  • CPAK-classification
  • patient-reported outcome measures
  • robotic assisted
  • total knee arthroplasty
  • ALIGNMENT

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Postoperative changes in CPAK-classification do not significantly influence patient-reported outcome measures following conventional or robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: A randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this