Policy Change and Policy Incoherence: The Case of Competition versus Public

A.M. Hommels, T.M. Egyedi, E.M. Cleophas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper analyzes the struggle for policy coherence between two EU policy domains: competition policies and public safety policies. We use the notion of 'policy coherence' to demonstrate the difficulty of reconciling divergent policy aims, both within the EU and between the EU and its member states. We analyze the question what caused policy incoherence and why it occurred at a certain time. We aim to contribute to a further development of this concept in two ways: first, we apply it, for the first time, to an empirical domain that deals with EU internal relations. Second, we seek to enrich existing literature on policy incoherence with added insight into the causes and timing thereof. We use the notion of 'policy framing' to explain the occurrence of policy incoherence. In this way, we provide policy-makers and area stakeholders with advance warnings of the likelihood of its occurrence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)443-458
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of European Integration
Volume35
Issue number4
Early online date25 Sep 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2013

Keywords

  • European Union
  • Policy coherence
  • competition policy
  • policy framing
  • public safety policy
  • standardization
  • telecommunication

Cite this

@article{6c39370905574ea4b7792b2a5c5cbea0,
title = "Policy Change and Policy Incoherence: The Case of Competition versus Public",
abstract = "This paper analyzes the struggle for policy coherence between two EU policy domains: competition policies and public safety policies. We use the notion of 'policy coherence' to demonstrate the difficulty of reconciling divergent policy aims, both within the EU and between the EU and its member states. We analyze the question what caused policy incoherence and why it occurred at a certain time. We aim to contribute to a further development of this concept in two ways: first, we apply it, for the first time, to an empirical domain that deals with EU internal relations. Second, we seek to enrich existing literature on policy incoherence with added insight into the causes and timing thereof. We use the notion of 'policy framing' to explain the occurrence of policy incoherence. In this way, we provide policy-makers and area stakeholders with advance warnings of the likelihood of its occurrence.",
keywords = "European Union, Policy coherence, competition policy, policy framing, public safety policy, standardization, telecommunication",
author = "A.M. Hommels and T.M. Egyedi and E.M. Cleophas",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/07036337.2012.711826",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "443--458",
journal = "Journal of European Integration",
issn = "0703-6337",
publisher = "Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group",
number = "4",

}

Policy Change and Policy Incoherence: The Case of Competition versus Public. / Hommels, A.M.; Egyedi, T.M.; Cleophas, E.M.

In: Journal of European Integration, Vol. 35, No. 4, 01.01.2013, p. 443-458.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Policy Change and Policy Incoherence: The Case of Competition versus Public

AU - Hommels, A.M.

AU - Egyedi, T.M.

AU - Cleophas, E.M.

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - This paper analyzes the struggle for policy coherence between two EU policy domains: competition policies and public safety policies. We use the notion of 'policy coherence' to demonstrate the difficulty of reconciling divergent policy aims, both within the EU and between the EU and its member states. We analyze the question what caused policy incoherence and why it occurred at a certain time. We aim to contribute to a further development of this concept in two ways: first, we apply it, for the first time, to an empirical domain that deals with EU internal relations. Second, we seek to enrich existing literature on policy incoherence with added insight into the causes and timing thereof. We use the notion of 'policy framing' to explain the occurrence of policy incoherence. In this way, we provide policy-makers and area stakeholders with advance warnings of the likelihood of its occurrence.

AB - This paper analyzes the struggle for policy coherence between two EU policy domains: competition policies and public safety policies. We use the notion of 'policy coherence' to demonstrate the difficulty of reconciling divergent policy aims, both within the EU and between the EU and its member states. We analyze the question what caused policy incoherence and why it occurred at a certain time. We aim to contribute to a further development of this concept in two ways: first, we apply it, for the first time, to an empirical domain that deals with EU internal relations. Second, we seek to enrich existing literature on policy incoherence with added insight into the causes and timing thereof. We use the notion of 'policy framing' to explain the occurrence of policy incoherence. In this way, we provide policy-makers and area stakeholders with advance warnings of the likelihood of its occurrence.

KW - European Union

KW - Policy coherence

KW - competition policy

KW - policy framing

KW - public safety policy

KW - standardization

KW - telecommunication

U2 - 10.1080/07036337.2012.711826

DO - 10.1080/07036337.2012.711826

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 443

EP - 458

JO - Journal of European Integration

JF - Journal of European Integration

SN - 0703-6337

IS - 4

ER -