Plausibility Judgments of Atypical Symptoms Across Cultures: an Explorative Study Among Western and Non-Western Experts

Irena Boskovic, Douwe van der Heide, Lorraine Hope, Harald Merckelbach, Marko Jelicic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Symptom validity tests (SVTs) are predicated on the assumption that overendorsement of atypical symptoms flags symptom exaggeration (i.e., questionable symptom validity). However, few studies have explored how practitioners from different cultural backgrounds evaluate such symptoms. We asked professionals working in Western (n = 56) and non-Western countries (n = 37) to rate the plausibility of uncommon symptoms taken from the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS), dissociative symptoms from the Dissociative Experience Scale (DES-T), and standard symptoms (e.g., anxiety, depression) from the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18). Western and non-Western experts gave similar plausibility ratings to atypical, dissociative, and standard symptoms: both groups judged BSI-18 symptoms as significantly more plausible than either dissociative or atypical symptoms, while the latter two categories did not differ. Our results suggest that the strategy to detect symptom exaggeration by exploring overendorsement of atypical items might work in a non-western context as well.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)274-281
Number of pages8
JournalPSYCHOLOGICAL INJURY & LAW
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2017

Keywords

  • Journal Article
  • Cross-cultural research
  • ISSUES
  • Symptom validity assessment
  • Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology
  • MALINGERED-SYMPTOMATOLOGY SIMS
  • Atypical symptoms
  • STRUCTURED-INVENTORY
  • DISSOCIATIVE EXPERIENCES
  • VALIDITY

Cite this

@article{33dbe130f346490fb752ee0b476add0f,
title = "Plausibility Judgments of Atypical Symptoms Across Cultures: an Explorative Study Among Western and Non-Western Experts",
abstract = "Symptom validity tests (SVTs) are predicated on the assumption that overendorsement of atypical symptoms flags symptom exaggeration (i.e., questionable symptom validity). However, few studies have explored how practitioners from different cultural backgrounds evaluate such symptoms. We asked professionals working in Western (n = 56) and non-Western countries (n = 37) to rate the plausibility of uncommon symptoms taken from the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS), dissociative symptoms from the Dissociative Experience Scale (DES-T), and standard symptoms (e.g., anxiety, depression) from the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18). Western and non-Western experts gave similar plausibility ratings to atypical, dissociative, and standard symptoms: both groups judged BSI-18 symptoms as significantly more plausible than either dissociative or atypical symptoms, while the latter two categories did not differ. Our results suggest that the strategy to detect symptom exaggeration by exploring overendorsement of atypical items might work in a non-western context as well.",
keywords = "Journal Article, Cross-cultural research, ISSUES, Symptom validity assessment, Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology, MALINGERED-SYMPTOMATOLOGY SIMS, Atypical symptoms, STRUCTURED-INVENTORY, DISSOCIATIVE EXPERIENCES, VALIDITY",
author = "Irena Boskovic and {van der Heide}, Douwe and Lorraine Hope and Harald Merckelbach and Marko Jelicic",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s12207-017-9294-6",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "274--281",
journal = "PSYCHOLOGICAL INJURY & LAW",
issn = "1938-971X",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "3",

}

Plausibility Judgments of Atypical Symptoms Across Cultures : an Explorative Study Among Western and Non-Western Experts. / Boskovic, Irena; van der Heide, Douwe; Hope, Lorraine; Merckelbach, Harald; Jelicic, Marko.

In: PSYCHOLOGICAL INJURY & LAW, Vol. 10, No. 3, 09.2017, p. 274-281.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Plausibility Judgments of Atypical Symptoms Across Cultures

T2 - an Explorative Study Among Western and Non-Western Experts

AU - Boskovic, Irena

AU - van der Heide, Douwe

AU - Hope, Lorraine

AU - Merckelbach, Harald

AU - Jelicic, Marko

PY - 2017/9

Y1 - 2017/9

N2 - Symptom validity tests (SVTs) are predicated on the assumption that overendorsement of atypical symptoms flags symptom exaggeration (i.e., questionable symptom validity). However, few studies have explored how practitioners from different cultural backgrounds evaluate such symptoms. We asked professionals working in Western (n = 56) and non-Western countries (n = 37) to rate the plausibility of uncommon symptoms taken from the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS), dissociative symptoms from the Dissociative Experience Scale (DES-T), and standard symptoms (e.g., anxiety, depression) from the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18). Western and non-Western experts gave similar plausibility ratings to atypical, dissociative, and standard symptoms: both groups judged BSI-18 symptoms as significantly more plausible than either dissociative or atypical symptoms, while the latter two categories did not differ. Our results suggest that the strategy to detect symptom exaggeration by exploring overendorsement of atypical items might work in a non-western context as well.

AB - Symptom validity tests (SVTs) are predicated on the assumption that overendorsement of atypical symptoms flags symptom exaggeration (i.e., questionable symptom validity). However, few studies have explored how practitioners from different cultural backgrounds evaluate such symptoms. We asked professionals working in Western (n = 56) and non-Western countries (n = 37) to rate the plausibility of uncommon symptoms taken from the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS), dissociative symptoms from the Dissociative Experience Scale (DES-T), and standard symptoms (e.g., anxiety, depression) from the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18). Western and non-Western experts gave similar plausibility ratings to atypical, dissociative, and standard symptoms: both groups judged BSI-18 symptoms as significantly more plausible than either dissociative or atypical symptoms, while the latter two categories did not differ. Our results suggest that the strategy to detect symptom exaggeration by exploring overendorsement of atypical items might work in a non-western context as well.

KW - Journal Article

KW - Cross-cultural research

KW - ISSUES

KW - Symptom validity assessment

KW - Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology

KW - MALINGERED-SYMPTOMATOLOGY SIMS

KW - Atypical symptoms

KW - STRUCTURED-INVENTORY

KW - DISSOCIATIVE EXPERIENCES

KW - VALIDITY

U2 - 10.1007/s12207-017-9294-6

DO - 10.1007/s12207-017-9294-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 29057031

VL - 10

SP - 274

EP - 281

JO - PSYCHOLOGICAL INJURY & LAW

JF - PSYCHOLOGICAL INJURY & LAW

SN - 1938-971X

IS - 3

ER -