Abstract
Here we illuminate the often overlooked, yet pernicious impacts of corruption in planning. We used a sequential mixed-methods approach, inclusive of a survey of 82 planning practitioners in Ghana and semistructured interviews with 17 of these survey respondents, to investigate planners’ experiences of corruption. We found that incentives for corrupt behaviors, structured by the particularities of planning culture, are necessary but insufficient to unpack corruption in planning, both in and outside of sub-Saharan Africa. Personal values and coercion also play roles in incentivizing corruption. We also learned that practitioners rely on social coping mechanisms to resist corruption, which speaks broadly to practitioners monitoring themselves when institutional corruption controls seem weak or nonexistent within a planning culture. Further research across planning cultures is called for to develop planning curricula and practices that can help students and professional planners understand and resolve corruption and other moral dilemmas specific to their planning contexts.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 377-391 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Journal of the American Planning Association |
Volume | 88 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 15 Dec 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 3 Jul 2022 |
Keywords
- coercion
- corruption
- planning
- sub-Saharan Africa
- values
- URBAN
- DECENTRALIZATION
- MANAGEMENT
- DEMOCRACY
- POLITICS
- VALUES
- LIMITS