Physician-assisted suicide in psychiatry and loss of hope

Ron Berghmans, Guy Widdershoven*, Ineke Widdershoven-Heerding

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review


In the Netherlands, euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS) are considered acceptable medical practices in specific circumstances. The majority of cases of euthanasia and PAS involve patients suffering from cancer. However, in 1994 the Dutch Supreme Court in the so-called Chabot-case ruled that "the seriousness of the suffering of the patient does not depend on the cause of the suffering", thereby rejecting a distinction between physical (or somatic) and mental suffering. This opened the way for further debate about the acceptability of PAS in cases of serious and refractory mental illness. An important objection against offering PAS to mentally ill patients is that this might reinforce loss of hope, and demoralization. Based on an analysis of a reported case, this argument is evaluated. It is argued that offering PAS to a patient with a mental illness who suffers unbearably, enduringly and without prospect of relief does not necessarily imply taking away hope and can be ethically acceptable.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)436-443
JournalInternational Journal of Law and Psychiatry
Issue number5-6
Publication statusPublished - 2013


  • Physician-assisted suicide
  • Euthanasia
  • Psychiatry
  • Ethics
  • Hope
  • The Netherlands

Cite this