Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Physical activity advice from general practitioners in Germany: findings from a cross-sectional population survey of individuals with chronic ischaemic heart disease (OptiCor study)

  • Sabrina Hoppe
  • , Alicia Prinz
  • , Daniel Kotz
  • , Ute Mons
  • , Oliver Kuss
  • , Rik Crutzen
  • , Sabrina Kastaun*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Objectives The current German treatment guideline for chronic ischaemic heart disease (IHD) recommends that general practitioners (GPs) deliver brief advice on physical activity (PA) to patients with IHD. Such advice consists of at least three elements (ie, 3As): (1) assessing the PA level, (2) advising on PA and (3) assisting with recommendations. This study examined the extent to which individuals with self-reported IHD in Germany reported the receipt of such advice.Design Cross-sectional population-based face-to-face survey (from June 2023 to August 2024).Setting Households across Germany.Participants 1004 individuals aged 35+ years with self-reported IHD and GP contact.Outcome measures Primary outcome: self-reported proportions of receipt of GP-delivered PA advice according to the 3As. Main secondary outcome: associations between person characteristics and the likelihood of receiving PA advice.Results Among individuals with self-reported IHD, 36.4% (95% CI 33.4% to 39.4%) received all 3As of PA advice, 42.1% (95% CI 39.1% to 45.2%) received one or two elements, 9.9% (95% CI 8.1% to 11.8%) received no advice at all and 3.8% (95% CI 2.7% to 5.1%) were advised to avoid PA (7.9% did not remember/refused to answer). Women (vs men) were more likely to receive no advice (OR=1.74, 95% CI 1.11% to 2.72%), while middle (vs younger) aged individuals (OR=0.46, 95% CI 0.22% to 0.99%), those with PA levels of 1-149 min/week (vs no PA; OR=0.16, 95% CI 0.08% to 0.31%) and of 150+ min/week (vs no PA; OR=0.13, 95% CI 0.07% to 0.23%) and those with higher (vs lower) education (OR=0.39, 95% CI 0.20% to 0.76%) were less likely to receive no advice. Individuals living in urban (vs rural) areas (OR=0.65, 95% CI 0.46% to 0.88%) and those with PA levels of 1-149 min/week (vs no PA; OR=0.59, 95% CI 0.37% to 0.95%) and of 150+ min/week (vs no PA; OR=0.55, 95% CI 0.36% to 0.84%) were less likely to receive only one or two (vs all) of the 3As. Of those who received at least one element of advice (n=788), 72.5% reported they were more active afterwards, with a higher proportion when all 3As (vs only some elements) were provided (86.8% vs 59.6%).Conclusions Only one-third of individuals with self-reported IHD in Germany received comprehensive PA advice. Specific person characteristics, such as female gender and lower education, were associated with lower proportions of received PA advice. Efforts are needed to improve GP-led PA guidance, particularly for underserved groups.Trial registration number German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00031304).
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere101017
Pages (from-to)e101017
Number of pages12
JournalBMJ Open
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Feb 2026

Keywords

  • Ischaemic heart disease
  • Coronary heart disease
  • Exercise
  • Primary Care
  • Quality in health care
  • PRIMARY-CARE
  • ACTIVITY PROMOTION
  • INTERVENTIONS
  • PREVENTION
  • ADULTS
  • EXERCISE

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Physical activity advice from general practitioners in Germany: findings from a cross-sectional population survey of individuals with chronic ischaemic heart disease (OptiCor study)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this