Phase-dependent word perception emerges from region-specific sensitivity to the statistics of language

  • Sanne Ten Oever*
  • , Lorenzo Titone
  • , Noémie Te Rietmolen
  • , Andrea E Martin
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Neural oscillations reflect fluctuations in excitability, which biases the percept of ambiguous sensory input. Why this bias occurs is still not fully understood. We hypothesized that neural populations representing likely events are more sensitive, and thereby become active on earlier oscillatory phases, when the ensemble itself is less excitable. Perception of ambiguous input presented during less-excitable phases should therefore be biased toward frequent or predictable stimuli that have lower activation thresholds. Here, we show such a frequency bias in spoken word recognition using psychophysics, magnetoencephalography (MEG), and computational modelling. With MEG, we found a double dissociation, where the phase of oscillations in the superior temporal gyrus and medial temporal gyrus biased word-identification behavior based on phoneme and lexical frequencies, respectively. This finding was reproduced in a computational model. These results demonstrate that oscillations provide a temporal ordering of neural activity based on the sensitivity of separable neural populations.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere2320489121
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume121
Issue number23
Early online date28 May 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Jun 2024

Keywords

  • MEG
  • neural oscillations
  • phase
  • speech
  • spoken word recognition
  • Humans
  • Magnetoencephalography
  • Language
  • Speech Perception/physiology
  • Male
  • Female
  • Adult
  • Temporal Lobe/physiology
  • Young Adult
  • Models, Neurological

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Phase-dependent word perception emerges from region-specific sensitivity to the statistics of language'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this