Abstract
This paper shows that personal norms have a prominent role in explaining pro-social contribution in an online public good game. This finding suggests that the role of social norms might be loosened when subjects are distanced and interaction occurs online and in complete anonymity. Moreover, we found no statistically significant difference between the elicited norms and the norms that were elicited in a group of subjects not facing the contribution task, thus ruling out a potential self-justification bias.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 110024 |
Number of pages | 3 |
Journal | Economics Letters |
Volume | 207 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Oct 2021 |
JEL classifications
- c90 - Design of Experiments: General
- d71 - "Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations"
- h40 - Publicly Provided Goods: General
Keywords
- Public good game
- Online experiment
- Personal norms
- Social norms
- Belief elicitation
- Social dilemma