Abstract
This paper studies the impact of incentives on worker self-selection in a controlled laboratory experiment. Subjects face the choice between a fixed and a variable payment scheme. Depending on the treatment, the variable payment is a piece rate, a tournament, or a revenue-sharing scheme. We find that output is higher in the variable-payment schemes compared to the fixed-payment scheme. This difference is largely driven by productivity sorting. In addition, different incentive schemes systematically attract individuals with different attitudes, such as willingness to take risks and relative self-assessment as well as gender, which underlines the importance of multidimensional sorting. (JEL C91, D81, D82, J16, J31)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 556-590 |
Number of pages | 35 |
Journal | American Economic Review |
Volume | 101 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2011 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Performance pay and multi-dimensional sorting: Productivity, preferences and gender'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Datasets
-
Replication data for: Performance Pay and Multidimensional Sorting: Productivity, Preferences, and Gender
Dohmen, T. (Creator) & Falk, A. (Contributor), ICPSR, 11 Oct 2019
DOI: 10.3886/e112408v1, https://doi.org/10.3886%2Fe112408v1
Dataset/Software: Dataset