Patient Safety Risks of Basic Urological Procedures Performed by Junior and Senior Residents

Anna H. de Vries*, Maaike C. Boute, Malou C. P. Kuppen, Jeroen J. G. van Merrienboer, Evert L. Koldewijn, Rob C. M. Pelger, Barbara M. A. Schout, Cordula Wagner

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Citations (Web of Science)
17 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the current performance of urological residents regarding basic urological procedures in relation to patient safety issues and the identification of specific training needs. DESIGN: Observational data of 146 urethrocystoscopies (UCSs), 27 transrectal ultrasounds of the prostate (TRUSs), 38 transrectal ultrasound-guided prostatic biopsies (TRUSPs), and 30 transurethral resections of bladder tumor (TURBTs) were collected. Performance was evaluated using scoring lists including details on completeness of procedural steps, level of independence, time, and the incidence of unintended events. The causal factors contributing to the unintended events were identified by 2 expert urologists and classified according to the recognized PRISMA method. SETTING: This study was performed in 5 teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: We included 11 junior residents and 5 senior residents in urology in the final study cohort. RESULTS: Senior residents showed a lower degree of completeness in material usage than junior residents did during UCS (p <0.01) and in preparation, material usage, and procedure during TRUSP (all p <0.05). In UCS and TURBT, senior residents received significantly less feedback than junior residents did (both p <0.01). Incidence of unintended events for junior vs senior residents was 11% and 4% in UCS, 0% and 7% in transrectal ultrasound of the prostate, 36% and 62% in TRUSP, and 41% and 23% in TURBT, respectively. Overall, unintended events were mainly caused by human factors, in particular, verification and skills-based issues. CONCLUSION: Present performance of basic urological procedures involves a high percentage of unintended events, especially in TRUSP and TURBT, which are mainly caused by human factors and are a potential threat for patient safety. Junior residents are less independent but more thorough in the performance of UCS and TRUSP than senior residents are. Targeted skills training including assessment should be implemented before privileges for independent practice are granted to reduce the incidence of unintended events and optimize patient safety.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)918-926
JournalJournal of Surgical Education
Volume72
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Keywords

  • task performance
  • resident
  • urology
  • adverse event
  • patient safety
  • practical skills training

Cite this