Abstract
Two studies are reported that tested the fear-avoidance (FA) model using path analytic techniques. In study 1, 429 employees with back pain at baseline and back pain at 18 months follow-up completed questionnaires assessing sociodemographic information, pain severity, negative affect, pain-related fear, and disability. Results indicated that pain severity at baseline predicted pain-related fear and disability at follow-up, and that pain-related fear is rather a consequence than an antecedent of pain severity. Results further revealed that the disposition to experience negative affect has a low impact upon pain severity and disability, and is best viewed as a precursor of pain-related fear. Study 2 included 238 employees without back pain at baseline, but who developed back pain at 1 year follow-up. A similar model as in study 1 was tested. Overall, results are in line with those of study 1. Results are discussed in terms of theoretical relevance and clinical implications.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 870.e1-870.e9 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | European Journal of Pain |
Volume | 14 |
Issue number | 8 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2010 |
Keywords
- ATTENTION
- Back pain
- CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS
- Disability
- FIT INDEXES
- Fear
- Fear-avoidance model
- KINESIOPHOBIA
- LOW-BACK-PAIN
- MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN
- OCCUPATIONAL SETTINGS
- PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES
- Pain
- SICK LEAVE
- TAMPA SCALE