Overview of recent cases before the Court of Justice of the European Union (September-December 2022)

P. Melin*, S. Sivonen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Five judgments from the Court of Justice on social security are reported on in this case note. First, Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringbank v X and Y (C-713/20) concerns the legislation applicable under Regulation 883/2004 to temporary agency workers in relation to periods between contracts. Second, DN v Finanzamt osterreich (Recouvrement de prestations familiales) (C-199/21) deals with the right to receive family benefits for a parent not residing with his child but bearing the costs of maintenance. Third, MCM v Centrala studiestodsnamnden (C-638/20) is about the export of student financial assistance for family members of migrant workers under Article 45 TFEU. Fourth, the requirement to register a partnership for the purpose of accessing a survivor's pension in a Member State, although that partnership was lawfully concluded and registered in another Member State, is under scrutiny in Caisse nationale d'assurance pension (C-731/21). Fifth and finally, FK v Rechtsanwaltskammer Wien (C-58/21) discusses the requirement to waive one's right to practise as a lawyer in other Member States in order to be granted an early retirement pension in light of Articles 45 TFEU and Article 49 TFEU.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)77-86
Number of pages10
JournalEuropean Journal of Social Security
Volume25
Issue number1
Early online date1 Feb 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2023

Keywords

  • Article 45 TFEU
  • family benefits
  • pension
  • temporary agency worker
  • lawyer
  • study grant
  • registered partnership

Cite this