Abstract
In this case note, nine judgments of the Court will be discussed. The first two judgments discussed concern the principle of equal treatment in relation to family benefits (S v Familienkasse and Commission v Austria). Additionally, both the first and third judgments reported relate to the interpretation of the Citizenship Directive (Directive 2004/38) (S v Familienkasse and VI). The other judgments on social security deal with the calculation of old-age pension (CC) and the legislation applicable for flight and cabin crew (INAIL and INPS) under Regulation 883/2004. The four remaining judgments are cases of discrimination on grounds of sex in the context of pensions (KM v INSS and EB v BVAEB), on grounds of age (A v HK Danmark and HK/Privat) and between temporary agency workers and 'regular' workers (Luso Temp).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 361-375 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | European Journal of Social Security |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 18 Dec 2022 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2022 |
Keywords
- equal treatment
- citizenship Directive
- family benefits
- pension rights
- applicable legislation
- temporary agency work
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Overview of Recent Cases Before the Court of Justice of the European Union (March -September 2022)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver