Abstract
In this case note, nine judgments of the Court will be discussed. The first two judgments discussed concern the principle of equal treatment in relation to family benefits (S v Familienkasse and Commission v Austria). Additionally, both the first and third judgments reported relate to the interpretation of the Citizenship Directive (Directive 2004/38) (S v Familienkasse and VI). The other judgments on social security deal with the calculation of old-age pension (CC) and the legislation applicable for flight and cabin crew (INAIL and INPS) under Regulation 883/2004. The four remaining judgments are cases of discrimination on grounds of sex in the context of pensions (KM v INSS and EB v BVAEB), on grounds of age (A v HK Danmark and HK/Privat) and between temporary agency workers and 'regular' workers (Luso Temp).
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 361-375 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | European Journal of Social Security |
Volume | 24 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 18 Dec 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2022 |
Keywords
- equal treatment
- citizenship Directive
- family benefits
- pension rights
- applicable legislation
- temporary agency work