Overview of recent cases before the Court of Justice of the European Union (February 2019-June 2019)

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialProfessional

Abstract

In the reporting period (February 2019-June 2019), the Court of Justice of the European Union did not deliver any ground breaking rulings that really altered existing coordination rules on social security. Nonetheless, the Court did rule in various interesting cases. These include the material scope of Regulation 883/2004 (Dreyer), the rules determining the applicable legislation (SF), invalidity benefits (Vester), and family benefits (Bogatu). In addition, the Court brought about clarification of the possibility of retaining worker status (and thus claiming social benefits as a worker) under Directive 2004/38 (Tarola) and the right of Turkish nationals to export benefits under Decision 3/80 when returning to Turkey (Coban).
Original languageEnglish
Article number1388262719870756
Pages (from-to)272-280
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean Journal of Social Security
Volume21
Issue number3
Early online date25 Aug 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2019

Keywords

  • social security
  • conflict rules
  • invalidity benefits
  • family benefits
  • retirement pensions
  • Social security

Cite this

@article{85d98eb5ad164c9d9e23d3971bd2a4ce,
title = "Overview of recent cases before the Court of Justice of the European Union (February 2019-June 2019)",
abstract = "In the reporting period (February 2019-June 2019), the Court of Justice of the European Union did not deliver any ground breaking rulings that really altered existing coordination rules on social security. Nonetheless, the Court did rule in various interesting cases. These include the material scope of Regulation 883/2004 (Dreyer), the rules determining the applicable legislation (SF), invalidity benefits (Vester), and family benefits (Bogatu). In addition, the Court brought about clarification of the possibility of retaining worker status (and thus claiming social benefits as a worker) under Directive 2004/38 (Tarola) and the right of Turkish nationals to export benefits under Decision 3/80 when returning to Turkey (Coban).",
keywords = "social security, conflict rules, invalidity benefits, family benefits, retirement pensions, Social security",
author = "{van der Mei}, Anne and Pauline Melin",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1177/1388262719870756",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "272--280",
journal = "European Journal of Social Security",
issn = "1388-2627",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

Overview of recent cases before the Court of Justice of the European Union (February 2019-June 2019). / van der Mei, Anne; Melin, Pauline.

In: European Journal of Social Security, Vol. 21, No. 3, 1388262719870756, 09.2019, p. 272-280.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialProfessional

TY - JOUR

T1 - Overview of recent cases before the Court of Justice of the European Union (February 2019-June 2019)

AU - van der Mei, Anne

AU - Melin, Pauline

PY - 2019/9

Y1 - 2019/9

N2 - In the reporting period (February 2019-June 2019), the Court of Justice of the European Union did not deliver any ground breaking rulings that really altered existing coordination rules on social security. Nonetheless, the Court did rule in various interesting cases. These include the material scope of Regulation 883/2004 (Dreyer), the rules determining the applicable legislation (SF), invalidity benefits (Vester), and family benefits (Bogatu). In addition, the Court brought about clarification of the possibility of retaining worker status (and thus claiming social benefits as a worker) under Directive 2004/38 (Tarola) and the right of Turkish nationals to export benefits under Decision 3/80 when returning to Turkey (Coban).

AB - In the reporting period (February 2019-June 2019), the Court of Justice of the European Union did not deliver any ground breaking rulings that really altered existing coordination rules on social security. Nonetheless, the Court did rule in various interesting cases. These include the material scope of Regulation 883/2004 (Dreyer), the rules determining the applicable legislation (SF), invalidity benefits (Vester), and family benefits (Bogatu). In addition, the Court brought about clarification of the possibility of retaining worker status (and thus claiming social benefits as a worker) under Directive 2004/38 (Tarola) and the right of Turkish nationals to export benefits under Decision 3/80 when returning to Turkey (Coban).

KW - social security

KW - conflict rules

KW - invalidity benefits

KW - family benefits

KW - retirement pensions

KW - Social security

U2 - 10.1177/1388262719870756

DO - 10.1177/1388262719870756

M3 - Editorial

VL - 21

SP - 272

EP - 280

JO - European Journal of Social Security

JF - European Journal of Social Security

SN - 1388-2627

IS - 3

M1 - 1388262719870756

ER -