Outpatient psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder: randomized trial of schema-focused therapy vs transference-focused psychotherapy

J. Giesen-Bloo, R. van Dyck, P. Spinhoven, W. van Tilburg, C.D. Dirksen, T. van Asselt, I. Kremers, M. Nadort, A.R. Arntz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

581 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context: Borderline personality disorder is a severe and chronic psychiatric condition, prevalent throughout health care settings. Only limited effects of current treatments have been documented. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of schema-focused therapy (SFT) and psychodynamically based transference-focused psychotherapy (TFP) in patients with borderline personality disorder. Design: A multicenter, randomized, 2-group design. Setting: Four general community mental health centers. Participants: Eighty-eight patients with a Borderline Personality Disorder Severity Index, fourth version, score greater than a predetermined cutoff score. Intervention: Three years of either SFT or TFP with sessions twice a week. Main Outcome Measures: Borderline Personality Disorder Severity Index, fourth version, score; quality of life; general psychopathologic dysfunction; and measures of SFT/TFP personality concepts. Patient assessments were made before randomization and then every 3 months for 3 years. Results: Data on 44 SFT patients and 42 TFP patients were available. The sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the groups were similar at baseline. Survival analyses revealed a higher dropout risk for TFP patients than for SFT patients (P = .01). Using an intention-to-treat approach, statistically and clinically significant improvements were found for both treatments on all measures after 1-, 2-, and 3- year treatment periods. After 3 years of treatment, survival analyses demonstrated that significantly more SFT patients recovered (relative risk = 2.18; P = .04) or showed reliable clinical improvement (relative risk = 2.33; P = .009) on the Borderline Personality Disorder Severity Index, fourth version. Robust analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) showed that they also improved more in general psychopathologic dysfunction and measures of SFT/TFP personality concepts (P <.001). Finally, SFT patients showed greater increases in quality of life than TFP patients (robust ANCOVAs, P = .03 and P <.001). Conclusions: Three years of SFT or TFP proved to be effective in reducing borderline personality disorder specific and general psychopathologic dysfunction and measures of SFT/TFP concepts and in improving quality of life; SFT is more effective than TFP for all measures.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)649-58
JournalArchives of General Psychiatry
Volume63
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2006

Cite this