Outcomes of One-Side Versus Two-Sides Recipient Vessels for Bilateral Breast Reconstructions With Bilateral DIEP Flaps

Shan Shan Qiu Shao; Jung-Ju Huang; Chih-Wei Wu; Georgios Kolios; Ming-Huei Cheng

doi:10.1002/jso.24270

Outcomes of One-Side Versus Two-Sides Recipient Vessels for Bilateral Breast Reconstructions With Bilateral DIEP Flaps

Shan Shan Qiu Shao, Jung-Ju Huang, Chih-Wei Wu, Georgios Kolios, Ming-Huei Cheng^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

3 Citations (Web of Science)

Abstract

This study was to compare the use of one-side versus two-sides recipient vessels in either bilateral breast reconstructions or unilateral breast reconstruction with contralateral augmentation using bilateral DIEP flaps.A retrospective review including all cases of bilateral breast reconstructions and unilateral reconstruction with contralateral augmentation with DIEP flaps was performed. Patient's demographics, surgical variables, and outcome were collected. Two distinct cohorts based on the recipient vessel techniques, one-side versus two-sides, were compared.A total of 25 patients with 50 split-DIEP flaps were included, with one-side recipient vessels used in 19 patients and two-sides recipient vessels in 6 patients. Ischemia time was significantly reduced in one-side recipient group compared to two-sides recipient vessels group (62.4?21.3 vs. 105.9?32.5, P?

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	5-10
Journal	Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume	114
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24270
Publication status	Published - 1 Jul 2016

Keywords

bilateral breast reconstructions
single recipient site
bilateral DIEP flaps

Access to Document

10.1002/jso.24270

Cite this

@article{e0fbf5ee733349cf819e023373412a21,

title = "Outcomes of One-Side Versus Two-Sides Recipient Vessels for Bilateral Breast Reconstructions With Bilateral DIEP Flaps",

abstract = "This study was to compare the use of one-side versus two-sides recipient vessels in either bilateral breast reconstructions or unilateral breast reconstruction with contralateral augmentation using bilateral DIEP flaps.A retrospective review including all cases of bilateral breast reconstructions and unilateral reconstruction with contralateral augmentation with DIEP flaps was performed. Patient's demographics, surgical variables, and outcome were collected. Two distinct cohorts based on the recipient vessel techniques, one-side versus two-sides, were compared.A total of 25 patients with 50 split-DIEP flaps were included, with one-side recipient vessels used in 19 patients and two-sides recipient vessels in 6 patients. Ischemia time was significantly reduced in one-side recipient group compared to two-sides recipient vessels group (62.4?21.3 vs. 105.9?32.5, P?",

keywords = "bilateral breast reconstructions, single recipient site, bilateral DIEP flaps",

author = "{Qiu Shao}, {Shan Shan} and Jung-Ju Huang and Chih-Wei Wu and Georgios Kolios and Ming-Huei Cheng",

year = "2016",

month = jul,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1002/jso.24270",

language = "English",

volume = "114",

pages = "5--10",

journal = "Journal of Surgical Oncology",

issn = "0022-4790",

publisher = "Wiley",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outcomes of One-Side Versus Two-Sides Recipient Vessels for Bilateral Breast Reconstructions With Bilateral DIEP Flaps

AU - Qiu Shao, Shan Shan

AU - Huang, Jung-Ju

AU - Wu, Chih-Wei

AU - Kolios, Georgios

AU - Cheng, Ming-Huei

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - This study was to compare the use of one-side versus two-sides recipient vessels in either bilateral breast reconstructions or unilateral breast reconstruction with contralateral augmentation using bilateral DIEP flaps.A retrospective review including all cases of bilateral breast reconstructions and unilateral reconstruction with contralateral augmentation with DIEP flaps was performed. Patient's demographics, surgical variables, and outcome were collected. Two distinct cohorts based on the recipient vessel techniques, one-side versus two-sides, were compared.A total of 25 patients with 50 split-DIEP flaps were included, with one-side recipient vessels used in 19 patients and two-sides recipient vessels in 6 patients. Ischemia time was significantly reduced in one-side recipient group compared to two-sides recipient vessels group (62.4?21.3 vs. 105.9?32.5, P?

AB - This study was to compare the use of one-side versus two-sides recipient vessels in either bilateral breast reconstructions or unilateral breast reconstruction with contralateral augmentation using bilateral DIEP flaps.A retrospective review including all cases of bilateral breast reconstructions and unilateral reconstruction with contralateral augmentation with DIEP flaps was performed. Patient's demographics, surgical variables, and outcome were collected. Two distinct cohorts based on the recipient vessel techniques, one-side versus two-sides, were compared.A total of 25 patients with 50 split-DIEP flaps were included, with one-side recipient vessels used in 19 patients and two-sides recipient vessels in 6 patients. Ischemia time was significantly reduced in one-side recipient group compared to two-sides recipient vessels group (62.4?21.3 vs. 105.9?32.5, P?

KW - bilateral breast reconstructions

KW - single recipient site

KW - bilateral DIEP flaps

U2 - 10.1002/jso.24270

DO - 10.1002/jso.24270

M3 - Article

C2 - 27111598

SN - 0022-4790

VL - 114

SP - 5

EP - 10

JO - Journal of Surgical Oncology

JF - Journal of Surgical Oncology

IS - 1

ER -