Outcome Priorities for Older Persons With Sarcopenia

Mickael Hiligsmann*, Charlotte Beaudart, Olivier Bruyere, Emmanuel Biver, Juergen Bauer, Alfonso J. Cruz-Jentoft, Antonella Gesmundo, Sabine Goisser, Francesco Landi, Medea Locquet, Stefania Maggi, Rene Rizzoli, Yves Rolland, Nieves Vaquero, Cyrus Cooper, Jean-Yves Reginster, European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO)

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review


Objectives: To evaluate patients' preferences for sarcopenia outcomes.

Design: Discrete-choice experiment (DCE)

Setting and Participants: Community-dwelling individuals older than 65 years suffering from sarcopenia recruited in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and Switzerland, who visited the clinic and were cognitively able to understand and fill out the survey.

Methods: In the DCE survey, participants were repetitively asked to choose which one of the 2 patients suffering from sarcopenia deserves treatment the most. The 2 patients presented different levels of risk for 5 preselected sarcopenia outcomes: quality of life, mobility, domestic activities, fatigue, and falls. The DCE included 12 choice sets. Mixed logit panel model was used to estimate patients preferences and latent class model was conducted to identify profiles of responses.

Results: A total of 216 sarcopenic persons were included for the analysis (68% women; mean age 78 years). All 5 preselected sarcopenia outcomes were shown to be significant. Overall, the most important sarcopenia outcome was mobility (30%), followed by the ability to manage domestic activities (22%), the risk of falls (18%), fatigue (17%), and quality of life (14%). The latent class model identified 2 classes of respondents. In the first class (probability of 56%), participants valued mobility the most (42%), followed by the ability to manage domestic activities (23%) and risk of falls (17%). In the second class, fatigue was the most important outcome (27%) followed by domestic activities (19%) and risk of falls (19%). No statistically significant associations between the latent classes and sociodemographic characteristics were found.

Conclusions and Implications: This study suggests that all 5 preselected outcomes were important for sarcopenic older individuals. Overall, the most important outcomes were mobility and the ability to manage domestic activities, although variations in preferences were observed between respondents. This could help in incorporating patient preferences when designing appropriate solutions for individuals with sarcopenia. (C) 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)267-271.e2
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American Medical Directors Association
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2020


  • Discrete-choice experiment
  • sarcopenia
  • outcomes
  • patient preferences


Dive into the research topics of 'Outcome Priorities for Older Persons With Sarcopenia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this