Optimizing Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Remote Monitoring: A Practical Guide

  • Sylvain Ploux*
  • , Niraj Varma
  • , Marc Strik
  • , Arnaud Lazarus
  • , Pierre Bordachar
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal(Systematic) Review articlepeer-review

Abstract

Remote monitoring (RM) receives a Class I: Level of Evidence: A recommendation for the follow-up of patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, positioning the technology as standard of care. RM is often seen and sold as a plug-and-play technology, whereas fundamental differences exist in the philosophy and conception of the 5 main RM systems. The capabilities and limitations of the different RM systems need to be understood and taken into account when the decision is made to remotely manage an individual patient. The purpose of this review is to provide to the cardiologist practical information about RM systems’ specificities with respect to the different technical and clinical alerts. Clinically based indications and programming suggestions are provided.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)315-328
Number of pages14
JournalJACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
Volume3
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2017

Keywords

  • arrhythmia
  • implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
  • lead failure
  • remote monitoring
  • telemedicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Optimizing Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Remote Monitoring: A Practical Guide'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this