TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimising inter-patient image registration for image-based data mining in breast radiotherapy
AU - Jaikuna, Tanwiwat
AU - Wilson, Fiona
AU - Azria, David
AU - Chang-Claude, Jenny
AU - De Santis, Maria Carmen
AU - Gutiérrez-Enríquez, Sara
AU - van Herk, Marcel
AU - Hoskin, Peter
AU - Kotzki, Lea
AU - Lambrecht, Maarten
AU - Lingard, Zoe
AU - Seibold, Petra
AU - Seoane, Alejandro
AU - Sperk, Elena
AU - Paul Symonds, R.
AU - Talbot, Christopher J.
AU - Rancati, Tiziana
AU - Rattay, Tim
AU - Reyes, Victoria
AU - Rosenstein, Barry S.
AU - de Ruysscher, Dirk
AU - Vega, Ana
AU - Veldeman, Liv
AU - Webb, Adam
AU - West, Catharine ML
AU - Aznar, Marianne C.
AU - Vasquez Osorio, Eliana
N1 - Funding Information:
Tim Rattay is supported by the NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre . He was previously an NIHR Clinical Lecturer and was also funded by an NIHR Doctoral Research Fellowship. This publication presents independent research funded by the NIHR. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS , the NIHR or the Department of Health.
Funding Information:
The VHIO acknowledge the Cellex Foundation for providing research facilities, the CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya for institutional support, and the Agencia Estatal de Investigaci\u00F3n for their financial support as a Center of Excellence Severo Ochoa (CEX2020-001024-S/AEI/10.13039/501100011033).
Funding Information:
REQUITE received funding from the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development, and demonstration under grant agreement no. 601826. We thank all patients who participated in the REQUITE study and all study personnel involved in the REQUITE project. This work was supported by Cancer Research UK RadNet Manchester [C1994/A28701], the Cancer Research UK Cancer Research Manchester Centre (C147/A25254) and the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR203308). Marianne Aznar acknowledges the support of the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (Grant number EP/T028017/1) and the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR203308). Peter Hoskin was supported by the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR203308). Catharine M L West was supported by the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR203308). The researchers at DKFZ also thank Anusha M\u00FCller, Irmgard Helmbold, Sabine Behrens, Juan Camilo Rosas. Petra Seibold was supported by ERA PerMed 2018 funding (BMBF #01KU1912) and BfS funding (#3619S42261). Sara Guti\u00E9rrez-Enr\u00EDquez was supported by ERAPerMed JTC2018 funding (ERAPERMED2018-244 and SLT011/18/00005) and currently by the Government of Catalonia (2021SGR01112). The VHIO acknowledge the Cellex Foundation for providing research facilities, the CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya for institutional support, and the Agencia Estatal de Investigaci\u00F3n for their financial support as a Center of Excellence Severo Ochoa (CEX2020-001024-S/AEI/10.13039/501100011033). Tim Rattay is supported by the NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre. He was previously an NIHR Clinical Lecturer and was also funded by an NIHR Doctoral Research Fellowship. This publication presents independent research funded by the NIHR. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. This work uses data that has been provided by patients and collected by the NHS as part of their care and support. The data are collated, maintained and quality assured by the National Disease Registration Service, which is part of NHS England.
Funding Information:
The researchers at DKFZ also thank Anusha M\u00FCller, Irmgard Helmbold, Sabine Behrens, Juan Camilo Rosas. Petra Seibold was supported by ERA PerMed 2018 funding (BMBF #01KU1912) and BfS funding (# 3619S42261 ).
Funding Information:
This work was supported by Cancer Research UK RadNet Manchester [ C1994/A28701 ], the Cancer Research UK Cancer Research Manchester Centre ( C147/A25254 ) and the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre ( NIHR203308 ).
Funding Information:
REQUITE received funding from the European Union\u2019s Seventh Framework Programme for research , technological development, and demonstration under grant agreement no. 601826.
Funding Information:
Sara Guti\u00E9rrez-Enr\u00EDquez was supported by ERAPerMed JTC2018 funding (ERAPERMED2018-244 and SLT011/18/00005) and currently by the Government of Catalonia ( 2021SGR01112 ).
Funding Information:
Marianne Aznar acknowledges the support of the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (Grant number EP/T028017/1) and the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR203308).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2024
PY - 2024/10/1
Y1 - 2024/10/1
N2 - Background and purpose: Image-based data mining (IBDM) requires spatial normalisation to reference anatomy, which is challenging in breast radiotherapy due to variations in the treatment position, breast shape and volume. We aim to optimise spatial normalisation for breast IBDM. Materials and methods: Data from 996 patients treated with radiotherapy for early-stage breast cancer, recruited in the REQUITE study, were included. Patients were treated supine (n = 811), with either bilateral or ipsilateral arm(s) raised (551/260, respectively) or in prone position (n = 185). Four deformable image registration (DIR) configurations for extrathoracic spatial normalisation were tested. We selected the best-performing DIR configuration and further investigated two pathways: i) registering prone/supine cohorts independently and ii) registering all patients to a supine reference. The impact of arm positioning in the supine cohort was quantified. DIR accuracy was estimated using Normalised Cross Correlation (NCC), Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), mean Distance to Agreement (MDA), 95 % Hausdorff Distance (95 %HD), and inter-patient landmark registration uncertainty (ILRU). Results: DIR using B-spline and normalised mutual information (NMI) performed the best across all evaluation metrics. Supine-supine registrations yielded highest accuracy (0.98 ± 0.01, 0.91 ± 0.04, 0.23 ± 0.19 cm, 1.17 ± 1.18 cm, 0.51 ± 0.26 cm for NCC, DSC, MDA, 95 %HD, and ILRU), followed by prone-prone and supine-prone registrations. Arm positioning had no significant impact on registration performance. For the best DIR strategy, uncertainty of 0.44 and 0.81 cm in the breast and shoulder regions was found. Conclusions: B-spline algorithm using NMI and registered supine and prone cohorts independently provides the most optimal spatial normalisation strategy for breast IBDM.
AB - Background and purpose: Image-based data mining (IBDM) requires spatial normalisation to reference anatomy, which is challenging in breast radiotherapy due to variations in the treatment position, breast shape and volume. We aim to optimise spatial normalisation for breast IBDM. Materials and methods: Data from 996 patients treated with radiotherapy for early-stage breast cancer, recruited in the REQUITE study, were included. Patients were treated supine (n = 811), with either bilateral or ipsilateral arm(s) raised (551/260, respectively) or in prone position (n = 185). Four deformable image registration (DIR) configurations for extrathoracic spatial normalisation were tested. We selected the best-performing DIR configuration and further investigated two pathways: i) registering prone/supine cohorts independently and ii) registering all patients to a supine reference. The impact of arm positioning in the supine cohort was quantified. DIR accuracy was estimated using Normalised Cross Correlation (NCC), Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), mean Distance to Agreement (MDA), 95 % Hausdorff Distance (95 %HD), and inter-patient landmark registration uncertainty (ILRU). Results: DIR using B-spline and normalised mutual information (NMI) performed the best across all evaluation metrics. Supine-supine registrations yielded highest accuracy (0.98 ± 0.01, 0.91 ± 0.04, 0.23 ± 0.19 cm, 1.17 ± 1.18 cm, 0.51 ± 0.26 cm for NCC, DSC, MDA, 95 %HD, and ILRU), followed by prone-prone and supine-prone registrations. Arm positioning had no significant impact on registration performance. For the best DIR strategy, uncertainty of 0.44 and 0.81 cm in the breast and shoulder regions was found. Conclusions: B-spline algorithm using NMI and registered supine and prone cohorts independently provides the most optimal spatial normalisation strategy for breast IBDM.
KW - Breast radiotherapy
KW - Image registration
KW - Image-based data mining
KW - Spatial normalisation
U2 - 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100635
DO - 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100635
M3 - Article
SN - 2405-6316
VL - 32
JO - Physics & Imaging in Radiation Oncology
JF - Physics & Imaging in Radiation Oncology
M1 - 100635
ER -