Optimal Cognitive Distance and Absorptive Capacity

B. Nooteboom; W.P.M. Vanhaverbeke; G.M. Duysters; V. Gilsing; A. Oord

doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.04.003

Optimal Cognitive Distance and Absorptive Capacity

B. Nooteboom^*, W.P.M. Vanhaverbeke, G.M. Duysters, V. Gilsing, A. Oord

^*Corresponding author for this work

Mt Economic Research Inst on Innov/Techn

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

In this paper we test the relation between cognitive distance and innovation performance of firms engaged in technology-based alliances. The key finding is that the hypothesis of an inverted u-shaped effect of cognitive distance on innovation performance of firms is confirmed. Moreover, as expected, we found that the positive effect for firms is much higher when engaging in more radical, exploratory alliances than in more exploitative alliances. The effect of cumulative r&d turns out to be mixed. It appears to increase absorptive capacity, as expected, but there is clear evidence that it also reduces the effect of cognitive distance on novelty value, making it increasingly difficult to find additional novelty.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1016-1033
Journal	Research Policy
Volume	36
Issue number	7
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.04.003
Publication status	Published - 1 Jan 2007

Access to Document

10.1016/j.respol.2007.04.003

Cite this

@article{d16db8873e664535959455c86221f547,

title = "Optimal Cognitive Distance and Absorptive Capacity",

abstract = "In this paper we test the relation between cognitive distance and innovation performance of firms engaged in technology-based alliances. The key finding is that the hypothesis of an inverted u-shaped effect of cognitive distance on innovation performance of firms is confirmed. Moreover, as expected, we found that the positive effect for firms is much higher when engaging in more radical, exploratory alliances than in more exploitative alliances. The effect of cumulative r&d turns out to be mixed. It appears to increase absorptive capacity, as expected, but there is clear evidence that it also reduces the effect of cognitive distance on novelty value, making it increasingly difficult to find additional novelty.",

author = "B. Nooteboom and W.P.M. Vanhaverbeke and G.M. Duysters and V. Gilsing and A. Oord",

year = "2007",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.respol.2007.04.003",

language = "English",

volume = "36",

pages = "1016--1033",

journal = "Research Policy",

issn = "0048-7333",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimal Cognitive Distance and Absorptive Capacity

AU - Nooteboom, B.

AU - Vanhaverbeke, W.P.M.

AU - Duysters, G.M.

AU - Gilsing, V.

AU - Oord, A.

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - In this paper we test the relation between cognitive distance and innovation performance of firms engaged in technology-based alliances. The key finding is that the hypothesis of an inverted u-shaped effect of cognitive distance on innovation performance of firms is confirmed. Moreover, as expected, we found that the positive effect for firms is much higher when engaging in more radical, exploratory alliances than in more exploitative alliances. The effect of cumulative r&d turns out to be mixed. It appears to increase absorptive capacity, as expected, but there is clear evidence that it also reduces the effect of cognitive distance on novelty value, making it increasingly difficult to find additional novelty.

AB - In this paper we test the relation between cognitive distance and innovation performance of firms engaged in technology-based alliances. The key finding is that the hypothesis of an inverted u-shaped effect of cognitive distance on innovation performance of firms is confirmed. Moreover, as expected, we found that the positive effect for firms is much higher when engaging in more radical, exploratory alliances than in more exploitative alliances. The effect of cumulative r&d turns out to be mixed. It appears to increase absorptive capacity, as expected, but there is clear evidence that it also reduces the effect of cognitive distance on novelty value, making it increasingly difficult to find additional novelty.

U2 - 10.1016/j.respol.2007.04.003

DO - 10.1016/j.respol.2007.04.003

M3 - Article

SN - 0048-7333

VL - 36

SP - 1016

EP - 1033

JO - Research Policy

JF - Research Policy

IS - 7

ER -