Abstract
Even when there is a potential danger of opportunism, economic agents often initiate contracts or engage in trust. Considering a world with two types of agents, opportunists and non-opportunists, interacting under incomplete information, this article develops a simple two-stage game theoretic model to show how trust and cooperation can emerge in a one-shot interaction, even in the absence of a supporting incentive mechanism. Two classic paradigms are considered: the prisoner's dilemma and the game of chicken. In the context of the prisoner's dilemma, trust depends on the exogenous probability of having a non-opportunist partner, while in the game of chicken trust is purely a function of the payoffs. Contrary to intuition, a high ratio of non-opportunistic agents in the population does not favor contract initiation in the game of chicken and a strong presence of opportunists does not act as an impediment to respecting commitments.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 203-228 |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| Journal | Rationality and Society |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2007 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Opportunism, trust and cooperation: A game theoretic approach with heterogeneous agents'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver