On the Role of Theory and Modeling in Neuroscience

D. Levenstein, V.A. Alvarez, A. Amarasingham, H. Azab, Z.S. Chen, R.C. Gerkin, A. Hasenstaub, R. Iyer, R.B. Jolivet, S. Marzen, J.D. Monaco, A.A. Prinz, S. Quraishi, F. Santamaria, S. Shivkumar, M.F. Singh, R. Traub, F. Nadim, H.G. Rotstein, A.D. Redish*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In recent years, the field of neuroscience has gone through rapid experimental advances and a significant increase in the use of quantitative and computational methods. This growth has created a need for clearer analyses of the theory and modeling approaches used in the field. This issue is particularly complex in neuroscience because the field studies phenomena that cross a wide range of scales and often require consideration at varying degrees of abstraction, from precise biophysical interactions to the computations they implement. We argue that a pragmatic perspective of science, in which descriptive, mechanistic, and normative models and theories each playa distinct role in defining and bridging levels of abstraction, will facilitate neuroscientific practice. This analysis leads to methodological suggestions, including selecting a level of abstraction that is appropriate for a given problem, identifying transfer func-tions to connect models and data, and the use of models themselves as a form of experiment.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1074-1088
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Neuroscience
Volume43
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Feb 2023

Keywords

  • COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
  • ATTRACTOR DYNAMICS
  • PATH-INTEGRATION
  • PLACE CELLS
  • GRID CELLS
  • MEMORY
  • SCIENCE
  • MECHANISMS
  • SYSTEMS
  • FIELDS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On the Role of Theory and Modeling in Neuroscience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this