TY - JOUR
T1 - On the Clinical Pharmacology of Reactive Oxygen Species
AU - Casas, Ana
AU - Nogales, Cristian
AU - Mucke, Hermann A. M.
AU - Petraina, Alexandra
AU - Cuadrado, Antonio
AU - Rojo, Ana
AU - Ghezzi, Pietro
AU - Jaquet, Vincent
AU - Augsburger, Fiona
AU - Dufrasne, Francois
AU - Soubhye, Jalal
AU - Deshwal, Soni
AU - Di Sante, Moises
AU - Kaludercic, Nina
AU - Di Lisa, Fabio
AU - Schmidt, Harald H. H. W.
N1 - Funding Information:
Address correspondence to: Dr. Ana I. Casas, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected]; or Harald H. H. W. Schmidt, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected] This study was supported by the European Research Council Advanced Investigator Grant/RadMed [Grant 294683], Proof-of-Concept Grant/SAVEBRAIN [Grant 737586], and H2020 Project REPO-TRIAL [Grant 777111] (to H.H.H.W.S.) and short-term scientific missions by the COST Actions EU-ROS and Open-MultiMed, and Kootstra Talented Fellowship (Maastricht University) (to A.I.C.). https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.120.019422.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by The Author(s).
PY - 2020/10
Y1 - 2020/10
N2 - Reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been correlated with almost every human disease. Yet clinical exploitation of these hypotheses by pharmacological modulation of ROS has been scarce to nonexistent. Are ROS, thus, irrelevant for disease? No. One key misconception in the ROS field has been its consideration as a rather detrimental metabolic byproduct of cell metabolism, and thus, any approach eliminating ROS to a certain tolerable level would be beneficial. We now know, instead, that ROS at every concentration, low or high, can serve many essential signaling and metabolic functions. This likely explains why systemic, nonspecific antioxidants have failed in the clinic, often with neutral and sometimes even detrimental outcomes. Recently, drug development has focused, instead, on identifying and selectively modulating ROS enzymatic sources that in a given constellation cause disease while leaving ROS physiologic signaling and metabolic functions intact. As sources, the family of NADPH oxidases stands out as the only enzyme family solely dedicated to ROS formation. Selectively targeting disease-relevant ROS-related proteins is already quite advanced, as evidenced by several phase II/III clinical trials and the first drugs having passed registration. The ROS field is expanding by including target enzymes and maturing to resemble more and more modern, big data-enhanced drug discovery and development, including network pharmacology. By defining a disease based on a distinct mechanism, in this case ROS dysregulation, and not by a symptom or phenotype anymore, ROS pharmacology is leaping forward from a clinical underperformer to a proof of concept within the new era of mechanism-based precision medicine.Significance Statement-Despite being correlated to almost every human disease, nearly no ROS modulator has been translated to the clinics yet. Here, we move far beyond the old-fashioned misconception of ROS as detrimental metabolic by-products and suggest 1) novel pharmacological targeting focused on selective modulation of ROS enzymatic sources, 2) mechanism-based redefinition of diseases, and 3) network pharmacology within the ROS field, altogether toward the new era of ROS pharmacology in precision medicine.
AB - Reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been correlated with almost every human disease. Yet clinical exploitation of these hypotheses by pharmacological modulation of ROS has been scarce to nonexistent. Are ROS, thus, irrelevant for disease? No. One key misconception in the ROS field has been its consideration as a rather detrimental metabolic byproduct of cell metabolism, and thus, any approach eliminating ROS to a certain tolerable level would be beneficial. We now know, instead, that ROS at every concentration, low or high, can serve many essential signaling and metabolic functions. This likely explains why systemic, nonspecific antioxidants have failed in the clinic, often with neutral and sometimes even detrimental outcomes. Recently, drug development has focused, instead, on identifying and selectively modulating ROS enzymatic sources that in a given constellation cause disease while leaving ROS physiologic signaling and metabolic functions intact. As sources, the family of NADPH oxidases stands out as the only enzyme family solely dedicated to ROS formation. Selectively targeting disease-relevant ROS-related proteins is already quite advanced, as evidenced by several phase II/III clinical trials and the first drugs having passed registration. The ROS field is expanding by including target enzymes and maturing to resemble more and more modern, big data-enhanced drug discovery and development, including network pharmacology. By defining a disease based on a distinct mechanism, in this case ROS dysregulation, and not by a symptom or phenotype anymore, ROS pharmacology is leaping forward from a clinical underperformer to a proof of concept within the new era of mechanism-based precision medicine.Significance Statement-Despite being correlated to almost every human disease, nearly no ROS modulator has been translated to the clinics yet. Here, we move far beyond the old-fashioned misconception of ROS as detrimental metabolic by-products and suggest 1) novel pharmacological targeting focused on selective modulation of ROS enzymatic sources, 2) mechanism-based redefinition of diseases, and 3) network pharmacology within the ROS field, altogether toward the new era of ROS pharmacology in precision medicine.
KW - NITRIC-OXIDE SYNTHASE
KW - SOLUBLE GUANYLATE-CYCLASE
KW - TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR NRF2
KW - AMYOTROPHIC-LATERAL-SCLEROSIS
KW - SERUM URIC-ACID
KW - MONOAMINE-OXIDASE
KW - NADPH-OXIDASE
KW - XANTHINE-OXIDASE
KW - VITAMIN-E
KW - CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE
U2 - 10.1124/pr.120.019422
DO - 10.1124/pr.120.019422
M3 - (Systematic) Review article
C2 - 32859763
SN - 0031-6997
VL - 72
SP - 801
EP - 828
JO - Pharmacological Reviews
JF - Pharmacological Reviews
IS - 4
ER -