On common evaluation standards and the acceptance of wage inequality

Peter Werner*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This study investigates how the exogenous provision of norm information concerning wage inequality influences the acceptance of wage differences. In an experiment where one employer interacts with two employees who differ in productivities, two main treatments provide information suggesting either an injunctive norm for small or for large wage differences prior to the interaction. Norm-relevant information significantly shifts individual beliefs concerning the appropriateness of wage inequality: Subjects who receive information hinting at a norm for high (low) wage inequality are more (less) likely to consider larger wage differences to be appropriate. Yet, when a norm for low wage inequality is suggested, a non-negligible share of employers still differentiates strongly, making it difficult to coordinate on a commonly accepted norm for wage inequality. Moreover, norm information signaling high wage inequality positively affects the output of low-performing employees.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)137-156
Number of pages20
JournalGames and Economic Behavior
Volume145
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2024

JEL classifications

  • d63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
  • d64 - "Altruism; Philanthropy"
  • j31 - "Wage Level and Structure; Wage Differentials"
  • m52 - Personnel Economics: Compensation and Compensation Methods and Their Effects

Keywords

  • Experiment
  • Norms
  • Wage inequality
  • Wage transparency
  • Work performance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On common evaluation standards and the acceptance of wage inequality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this