Norms and screening utility of the Dutch version of the Children's Depression Inventory in clinical and nonclinical youths

J. Roelofs, C. Braet, L. Rood, B. Timbremont, L. van Vlierberghe, L. Goossens, G.J.P. van Breukelen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study aimed to (a) assess relationships between the Children's Depression Inventory (CDI) and DSM-oriented depression and anxiety scales of the Youth Self Report, (b) develop reliable norms for the CDI, and (c) determine CDI cutoff scores for selecting youngsters at risk for depression and anxiety. A total of 3,073 nonclinical and 511 clinically referred children and adolescents from The Netherlands and Belgium were included. Results showed that CDI scores were significantly related to DSM-oriented symptoms of both depression and anxiety. CDI scores correlated highly with depression symptoms and moderately with anxiety symptoms. Norms for the CDI were determined by means of multiple regression analysis and depended on sex, age, and country. CDI cutoff scores for selecting individuals at risk for depression and anxiety as measured by the DSM-oriented depression and anxiety scales of the Youth Self Report were determined by means of multiple regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic analysis. A CDI score of 16 was found to have the most optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity for depression, whereas a score of 21 provided the best sensitivity and specificity for anxiety in a subsample of children. We conclude that the CDI is an effective instrument for screening depression and to a lesser extent anxiety in primary and secondary care centers, before applying further assessment of high-risk individuals.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)866-877
Number of pages12
JournalPsychological Assessment
Volume22
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2010

Keywords

  • Children's Depression Inventory
  • cutoff
  • norming
  • RATING-SCALES
  • ADOLESCENTS
  • CHILDHOOD
  • ANXIETY
  • COMORBIDITY
  • PREVALENCE
  • RECURRENCE
  • DISORDER
  • SEX
  • AGE

Cite this

@article{1929be5ae7864a4092c7570ac5c37770,
title = "Norms and screening utility of the Dutch version of the Children's Depression Inventory in clinical and nonclinical youths",
abstract = "This study aimed to (a) assess relationships between the Children's Depression Inventory (CDI) and DSM-oriented depression and anxiety scales of the Youth Self Report, (b) develop reliable norms for the CDI, and (c) determine CDI cutoff scores for selecting youngsters at risk for depression and anxiety. A total of 3,073 nonclinical and 511 clinically referred children and adolescents from The Netherlands and Belgium were included. Results showed that CDI scores were significantly related to DSM-oriented symptoms of both depression and anxiety. CDI scores correlated highly with depression symptoms and moderately with anxiety symptoms. Norms for the CDI were determined by means of multiple regression analysis and depended on sex, age, and country. CDI cutoff scores for selecting individuals at risk for depression and anxiety as measured by the DSM-oriented depression and anxiety scales of the Youth Self Report were determined by means of multiple regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic analysis. A CDI score of 16 was found to have the most optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity for depression, whereas a score of 21 provided the best sensitivity and specificity for anxiety in a subsample of children. We conclude that the CDI is an effective instrument for screening depression and to a lesser extent anxiety in primary and secondary care centers, before applying further assessment of high-risk individuals.",
keywords = "Children's Depression Inventory, cutoff, norming, RATING-SCALES, ADOLESCENTS, CHILDHOOD, ANXIETY, COMORBIDITY, PREVALENCE, RECURRENCE, DISORDER, SEX, AGE",
author = "J. Roelofs and C. Braet and L. Rood and B. Timbremont and {van Vlierberghe}, L. and L. Goossens and {van Breukelen}, G.J.P.",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1037/a0020593",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "866--877",
journal = "Psychological Assessment",
issn = "1040-3590",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",
number = "4",

}

Norms and screening utility of the Dutch version of the Children's Depression Inventory in clinical and nonclinical youths. / Roelofs, J.; Braet, C.; Rood, L.; Timbremont, B.; van Vlierberghe, L.; Goossens, L.; van Breukelen, G.J.P.

In: Psychological Assessment, Vol. 22, No. 4, 12.2010, p. 866-877.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Norms and screening utility of the Dutch version of the Children's Depression Inventory in clinical and nonclinical youths

AU - Roelofs, J.

AU - Braet, C.

AU - Rood, L.

AU - Timbremont, B.

AU - van Vlierberghe, L.

AU - Goossens, L.

AU - van Breukelen, G.J.P.

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - This study aimed to (a) assess relationships between the Children's Depression Inventory (CDI) and DSM-oriented depression and anxiety scales of the Youth Self Report, (b) develop reliable norms for the CDI, and (c) determine CDI cutoff scores for selecting youngsters at risk for depression and anxiety. A total of 3,073 nonclinical and 511 clinically referred children and adolescents from The Netherlands and Belgium were included. Results showed that CDI scores were significantly related to DSM-oriented symptoms of both depression and anxiety. CDI scores correlated highly with depression symptoms and moderately with anxiety symptoms. Norms for the CDI were determined by means of multiple regression analysis and depended on sex, age, and country. CDI cutoff scores for selecting individuals at risk for depression and anxiety as measured by the DSM-oriented depression and anxiety scales of the Youth Self Report were determined by means of multiple regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic analysis. A CDI score of 16 was found to have the most optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity for depression, whereas a score of 21 provided the best sensitivity and specificity for anxiety in a subsample of children. We conclude that the CDI is an effective instrument for screening depression and to a lesser extent anxiety in primary and secondary care centers, before applying further assessment of high-risk individuals.

AB - This study aimed to (a) assess relationships between the Children's Depression Inventory (CDI) and DSM-oriented depression and anxiety scales of the Youth Self Report, (b) develop reliable norms for the CDI, and (c) determine CDI cutoff scores for selecting youngsters at risk for depression and anxiety. A total of 3,073 nonclinical and 511 clinically referred children and adolescents from The Netherlands and Belgium were included. Results showed that CDI scores were significantly related to DSM-oriented symptoms of both depression and anxiety. CDI scores correlated highly with depression symptoms and moderately with anxiety symptoms. Norms for the CDI were determined by means of multiple regression analysis and depended on sex, age, and country. CDI cutoff scores for selecting individuals at risk for depression and anxiety as measured by the DSM-oriented depression and anxiety scales of the Youth Self Report were determined by means of multiple regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic analysis. A CDI score of 16 was found to have the most optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity for depression, whereas a score of 21 provided the best sensitivity and specificity for anxiety in a subsample of children. We conclude that the CDI is an effective instrument for screening depression and to a lesser extent anxiety in primary and secondary care centers, before applying further assessment of high-risk individuals.

KW - Children's Depression Inventory

KW - cutoff

KW - norming

KW - RATING-SCALES

KW - ADOLESCENTS

KW - CHILDHOOD

KW - ANXIETY

KW - COMORBIDITY

KW - PREVALENCE

KW - RECURRENCE

KW - DISORDER

KW - SEX

KW - AGE

U2 - 10.1037/a0020593

DO - 10.1037/a0020593

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 866

EP - 877

JO - Psychological Assessment

JF - Psychological Assessment

SN - 1040-3590

IS - 4

ER -