Abstract
Every finite extensive-form game with perfect information has a subgame-perfect equilibrium. In this note we settle to the negative an open problem regarding the existence of a subgame-perfect e e\varepsilon -equilibrium in perfect information games with infinite horizon and borel measurable payoffs, by providing a counter-example. We also consider a refinement called strong subgame-perfect e e\varepsilon -equilibrium, and show by means of another counter-example, with a simpler structure than the previous one, that a game may have no strong subgame-perfect e e\varepsilon -equilibrium for sufficiently small e>0 e>0\varepsilon >0, even though it admits a subgame-perfect e e\varepsilon -equilibrium for every e>0 e>0\varepsilon >0.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 945-951 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | International Journal of Game Theory |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2014 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Non-Existence of Subgame-Perfect ε-Equilibrium in Perfect Information Games with Infinite Horizon'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver