Nitric Oxide Synthase Inhibitors into the Clinic at Last

Vu Thao-Vi Dao*, Mahmoud Elbatrik, Thomas Fuchß, Ulrich Grädler, Harald Schmidt, A.M. Shah, Richard Knowles

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademic

828 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The 1998 nobel prize in medicine and physiology for the discovery of nitric oxide, a nitrogen containing reactive oxygen species (also termed reactive nitrogen or reactive nitrogen/oxygen species) stirred great hopes. Clinical applications, however, have so far pertained exclusively to the downstream signaling of cgmp enhancing drugs such as phosphodiesterase inhibitors and soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators. All clinical attempts, so far, to inhibit nos have failed even though preclinical models were strikingly positive and clinical biomarkers correlated perfectly. This rather casts doubt on our current way of target identification in drug discovery in general and our way of patient stratification based on correlating but not causal biomarkers or symptoms. The opposite, no donors, nitrite and enhancing no synthesis by enos/nos3 recoupling in situations of no deficiency, are rapidly declining in clinical relevance or hold promise but need yet to enter formal therapeutic guidelines, respectively. Nevertheless, nos inhibition in situations of no overproduction often jointly with enhanced superoxide (or hydrogen peroxide production) still holds promise, but most likely only in acute conditions such as neurotrauma (stover et al., j neurotrauma 31(19):1599–1606, 2014) and stroke (kleinschnitz et al., j cereb blood flow metab 1508–1512, 2016; casas et al., proc natl acad sci u s a 116(14):7129–7136, 2019). Conversely, in chronic conditions, long-term inhibition of nos might be too risky because of off-target effects on enos/nos3 in particular for patients with cardiovascular risks or metabolic and renal diseases.graphical abstractnitric oxide synthases (nos) and their role in health (green) and disease (red). Only neuronal/type 1 nos (nos1) has a high degree of clinical validation and is in late stage development for traumatic brain injury, followed by a phase ii safety/efficacy trial in ischemic stroke. The pathophysiology of nos1 (kleinschnitz et al., j cereb blood flow metab 1508–1512, 2016) is likely to be related to parallel superoxide or hydrogen peroxide formation (kleinschnitz et al., j cereb blood flow metab 1508–1512, 2016; casas et al., proc natl acad sci u s a 114(46):12315–12320, 2017; casas et al., proc natl acad sci u s a 116(14):7129–7136, 2019) leading to peroxynitrite and protein nitration, etc. Endothelial/type 3 nos (nos3) is considered protective only and its inhibition should be avoided. The preclinical evidence for a role of high-output inducible/type 2 nos (nos2) isoform in sepsis, asthma, rheumatic arthritis, etc. Was high, but all clinical development trials in these indications were neutral despite target engagement being validated. This casts doubt on the role of nos2 in humans in health and disease (hence the neutral, black coloring).keywordsnitric oxidenitric oxide synthasenosnos inhibitor nos isoforms.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationReactive Oxygen Species
EditorsHarald H.H.W. Schmidt, Pietro Ghezzi, Antonio Cuadrado
PublisherSpringer, Cham
Pages169-204
Number of pages36
Volume1
ISBN (Print)978-3-030-68509-6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Publication series

SeriesHandbook of Experimental Pharmacology
Number1
ISSN0171-2004

Cite this