TY - CHAP
T1 - Nitric Oxide Synthase Inhibitors into the Clinic at Last
AU - Vu Thao-Vi Dao, null
AU - Elbatrik, Mahmoud
AU - Fuchß, Thomas
AU - Grädler, Ulrich
AU - Schmidt, Harald
AU - Shah, A.M.
AU - Knowles, Richard
N1 - Funding Information:
This review project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No 777111 (REPO-TRIAL). This reflects only the author’s view and the European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains. AMS is supported in part by the British Heart Foundation (CH/1999001/11735; RE/18/2/34213); the National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London (IS-BRC-1215-20006); and the Foundation Leducq. MHE is supported by the PhD research grant from the Egyptian Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - The 1998 nobel prize in medicine and physiology for the discovery of nitric oxide, a nitrogen containing reactive oxygen species (also termed reactive nitrogen or reactive nitrogen/oxygen species) stirred great hopes. Clinical applications, however, have so far pertained exclusively to the downstream signaling of cgmp enhancing drugs such as phosphodiesterase inhibitors and soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators. All clinical attempts, so far, to inhibit nos have failed even though preclinical models were strikingly positive and clinical biomarkers correlated perfectly. This rather casts doubt on our current way of target identification in drug discovery in general and our way of patient stratification based on correlating but not causal biomarkers or symptoms. The opposite, no donors, nitrite and enhancing no synthesis by enos/nos3 recoupling in situations of no deficiency, are rapidly declining in clinical relevance or hold promise but need yet to enter formal therapeutic guidelines, respectively. Nevertheless, nos inhibition in situations of no overproduction often jointly with enhanced superoxide (or hydrogen peroxide production) still holds promise, but most likely only in acute conditions such as neurotrauma (stover et al., j neurotrauma 31(19):1599–1606, 2014) and stroke (kleinschnitz et al., j cereb blood flow metab 1508–1512, 2016; casas et al., proc natl acad sci u s a 116(14):7129–7136, 2019). Conversely, in chronic conditions, long-term inhibition of nos might be too risky because of off-target effects on enos/nos3 in particular for patients with cardiovascular risks or metabolic and renal diseases.graphical abstractnitric oxide synthases (nos) and their role in health (green) and disease (red). Only neuronal/type 1 nos (nos1) has a high degree of clinical validation and is in late stage development for traumatic brain injury, followed by a phase ii safety/efficacy trial in ischemic stroke. The pathophysiology of nos1 (kleinschnitz et al., j cereb blood flow metab 1508–1512, 2016) is likely to be related to parallel superoxide or hydrogen peroxide formation (kleinschnitz et al., j cereb blood flow metab 1508–1512, 2016; casas et al., proc natl acad sci u s a 114(46):12315–12320, 2017; casas et al., proc natl acad sci u s a 116(14):7129–7136, 2019) leading to peroxynitrite and protein nitration, etc. Endothelial/type 3 nos (nos3) is considered protective only and its inhibition should be avoided. The preclinical evidence for a role of high-output inducible/type 2 nos (nos2) isoform in sepsis, asthma, rheumatic arthritis, etc. Was high, but all clinical development trials in these indications were neutral despite target engagement being validated. This casts doubt on the role of nos2 in humans in health and disease (hence the neutral, black coloring).keywordsnitric oxidenitric oxide synthasenosnos inhibitor nos isoforms.
AB - The 1998 nobel prize in medicine and physiology for the discovery of nitric oxide, a nitrogen containing reactive oxygen species (also termed reactive nitrogen or reactive nitrogen/oxygen species) stirred great hopes. Clinical applications, however, have so far pertained exclusively to the downstream signaling of cgmp enhancing drugs such as phosphodiesterase inhibitors and soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators. All clinical attempts, so far, to inhibit nos have failed even though preclinical models were strikingly positive and clinical biomarkers correlated perfectly. This rather casts doubt on our current way of target identification in drug discovery in general and our way of patient stratification based on correlating but not causal biomarkers or symptoms. The opposite, no donors, nitrite and enhancing no synthesis by enos/nos3 recoupling in situations of no deficiency, are rapidly declining in clinical relevance or hold promise but need yet to enter formal therapeutic guidelines, respectively. Nevertheless, nos inhibition in situations of no overproduction often jointly with enhanced superoxide (or hydrogen peroxide production) still holds promise, but most likely only in acute conditions such as neurotrauma (stover et al., j neurotrauma 31(19):1599–1606, 2014) and stroke (kleinschnitz et al., j cereb blood flow metab 1508–1512, 2016; casas et al., proc natl acad sci u s a 116(14):7129–7136, 2019). Conversely, in chronic conditions, long-term inhibition of nos might be too risky because of off-target effects on enos/nos3 in particular for patients with cardiovascular risks or metabolic and renal diseases.graphical abstractnitric oxide synthases (nos) and their role in health (green) and disease (red). Only neuronal/type 1 nos (nos1) has a high degree of clinical validation and is in late stage development for traumatic brain injury, followed by a phase ii safety/efficacy trial in ischemic stroke. The pathophysiology of nos1 (kleinschnitz et al., j cereb blood flow metab 1508–1512, 2016) is likely to be related to parallel superoxide or hydrogen peroxide formation (kleinschnitz et al., j cereb blood flow metab 1508–1512, 2016; casas et al., proc natl acad sci u s a 114(46):12315–12320, 2017; casas et al., proc natl acad sci u s a 116(14):7129–7136, 2019) leading to peroxynitrite and protein nitration, etc. Endothelial/type 3 nos (nos3) is considered protective only and its inhibition should be avoided. The preclinical evidence for a role of high-output inducible/type 2 nos (nos2) isoform in sepsis, asthma, rheumatic arthritis, etc. Was high, but all clinical development trials in these indications were neutral despite target engagement being validated. This casts doubt on the role of nos2 in humans in health and disease (hence the neutral, black coloring).keywordsnitric oxidenitric oxide synthasenosnos inhibitor nos isoforms.
U2 - 10.1007/164_2020_382
DO - 10.1007/164_2020_382
M3 - Chapter
C2 - 32797331
SN - 978-3-030-68509-6
VL - 1
T3 - Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology
SP - 169
EP - 204
BT - Reactive Oxygen Species
A2 - Schmidt, Harald H.H.W.
A2 - Ghezzi, Pietro
A2 - Cuadrado, Antonio
PB - Springer, Cham
ER -