New ways of seeing: Four ways you have not thought about Registered Reports yet

Fabiola H. Gerpott*, Roman Briker, George Banks

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The Leadership Quarterly has helped as a pioneer in accepting Registered Reports (RRs), a submission format where authors provide the introduction, theory section, and methods of their paper for peer review before data collection. Proud but never satisfied, we aim to further boost the number of suitable RR submissions due to our firm belief in their potential for fostering transparent, high-impact research. To inspire authors to explore diverse data collection strategies and methods beyond experiments and survey-based (replication) studies, this work presents four distinct but equally suitable research formats for RRs: meta-analyses, qualitative research, computational approaches, and field intervention studies. Expanding prior research that has explored and promoted general practices and methodological standards for RRs, we offer unique recommendations for preparing an adequate RR proposal along each of these four RR avenues. Additionally, we provide a table of summary resources for authors, reviewers, and editors looking to engage more with RR. In conclusion, we envision a future where other top-tier journals and funding agencies follow The Leadership Quarterly by embracing the incorporation of RRs as a critical component of their strategic approach.
Original languageEnglish
Article number101783
JournalLeadership Quarterly
Volume35
Issue number2
Early online date29 Feb 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2024

Keywords

  • Leadership
  • Open Science
  • Qualitative
  • Quantitative
  • Registered Reports
  • Transparency

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'New ways of seeing: Four ways you have not thought about Registered Reports yet'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this