Neuroscientific evidence for defensive avoidance of fear appeals

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous studies indicate that people respond defensively to threatening health information, especially when the information challenges self-relevant goals. The authors investigated whether reduced acceptance of self-relevant health risk information is already visible in early attention allocation processes. In two experimental studies, participants were watching high- and low-threat health commercials, and at the same time had to pay attention to specific odd auditory stimuli in a sequence of frequent auditory stimuli (odd ball paradigm). The amount of attention allocation was measured by recording event-related brain potentials (i.e., P300 ERPs) and reaction times. Smokers showed larger P300 amplitudes in response to the auditory targets while watching high-threat instead of low-threat anti-smoking commercials. In contrast, non-smokers showed smaller P300 amplitudes during watching high as opposed to low threat anti-smoking commercials. In conclusion, the findings provide further neuroscientific support for the hypothesis that threatening health information causes more avoidance responses among those for whom the health threat is self-relevant.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)80-88
JournalInternational Journal of Psychology
Volume49
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2014

Cite this

@article{bd32d886e47a4c38a8d34f1b21a65c86,
title = "Neuroscientific evidence for defensive avoidance of fear appeals",
abstract = "Previous studies indicate that people respond defensively to threatening health information, especially when the information challenges self-relevant goals. The authors investigated whether reduced acceptance of self-relevant health risk information is already visible in early attention allocation processes. In two experimental studies, participants were watching high- and low-threat health commercials, and at the same time had to pay attention to specific odd auditory stimuli in a sequence of frequent auditory stimuli (odd ball paradigm). The amount of attention allocation was measured by recording event-related brain potentials (i.e., P300 ERPs) and reaction times. Smokers showed larger P300 amplitudes in response to the auditory targets while watching high-threat instead of low-threat anti-smoking commercials. In contrast, non-smokers showed smaller P300 amplitudes during watching high as opposed to low threat anti-smoking commercials. In conclusion, the findings provide further neuroscientific support for the hypothesis that threatening health information causes more avoidance responses among those for whom the health threat is self-relevant.",
author = "L.T.E. Kessels and R.A.C. Ruiter and L. Wouters and B.M. Jansma",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ijop.12036",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "80--88",
journal = "International Journal of Psychology",
issn = "0020-7594",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Neuroscientific evidence for defensive avoidance of fear appeals. / Kessels, L.T.E.; Ruiter, R.A.C.; Wouters, L.; Jansma, B.M.

In: International Journal of Psychology, Vol. 49, No. 2, 01.01.2014, p. 80-88.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neuroscientific evidence for defensive avoidance of fear appeals

AU - Kessels, L.T.E.

AU - Ruiter, R.A.C.

AU - Wouters, L.

AU - Jansma, B.M.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Previous studies indicate that people respond defensively to threatening health information, especially when the information challenges self-relevant goals. The authors investigated whether reduced acceptance of self-relevant health risk information is already visible in early attention allocation processes. In two experimental studies, participants were watching high- and low-threat health commercials, and at the same time had to pay attention to specific odd auditory stimuli in a sequence of frequent auditory stimuli (odd ball paradigm). The amount of attention allocation was measured by recording event-related brain potentials (i.e., P300 ERPs) and reaction times. Smokers showed larger P300 amplitudes in response to the auditory targets while watching high-threat instead of low-threat anti-smoking commercials. In contrast, non-smokers showed smaller P300 amplitudes during watching high as opposed to low threat anti-smoking commercials. In conclusion, the findings provide further neuroscientific support for the hypothesis that threatening health information causes more avoidance responses among those for whom the health threat is self-relevant.

AB - Previous studies indicate that people respond defensively to threatening health information, especially when the information challenges self-relevant goals. The authors investigated whether reduced acceptance of self-relevant health risk information is already visible in early attention allocation processes. In two experimental studies, participants were watching high- and low-threat health commercials, and at the same time had to pay attention to specific odd auditory stimuli in a sequence of frequent auditory stimuli (odd ball paradigm). The amount of attention allocation was measured by recording event-related brain potentials (i.e., P300 ERPs) and reaction times. Smokers showed larger P300 amplitudes in response to the auditory targets while watching high-threat instead of low-threat anti-smoking commercials. In contrast, non-smokers showed smaller P300 amplitudes during watching high as opposed to low threat anti-smoking commercials. In conclusion, the findings provide further neuroscientific support for the hypothesis that threatening health information causes more avoidance responses among those for whom the health threat is self-relevant.

U2 - 10.1002/ijop.12036

DO - 10.1002/ijop.12036

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 80

EP - 88

JO - International Journal of Psychology

JF - International Journal of Psychology

SN - 0020-7594

IS - 2

ER -