Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Negative partisanship and affective polarization

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademic

Abstract

Research on the roots of affective polarization has often emphasized the role played by social identities, whereby identifying with a political party may lead to hostility towards the ‘other side’ of politics. Whilst fruitful, this approach does not account for the many citizens who feel strongly repelled by a particular party and yet feel attached to none. In this chapter, we shine a light on the role played by negative partisanship, voters’ rejection of a party, in fueling affective polarization. We argue that negative partisanship can be conceptualized and measured as a type of social identity (e.g., ‘I am not a Republican’), even in the absence of any positive partisan ties. In doing so, we clarify the relationship between negative partisanship and affective polarization and highlight the prominence of negative partisanship in established and newer democracies alike. We conclude by pointing out avenues for future research and by reflecting on the normative implications of this increasingly relevant, yet overlooked, concept.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHandbook of Affective Polarization
EditorsMariano Torcal, Eelco Harteveld
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing
Chapter12
Pages184–198
Number of pages15
ISBN (Electronic)9781035310609
ISBN (Print)9781035310593
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Jul 2025

Keywords

  • Negative Partisanship;
  • Affective Polarization
  • Political Identity
  • Attitudes
  • Political Behavior

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Negative partisanship and affective polarization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this