National Identity and the Protection of Fundamental Rights

M. Claes*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The article asks whether the European Union (EU)'s duty to protect national identities is a useful way to address diverging conceptions of fundamental rights, and it argues that it is not. On the basis of an examination of the text of Article 4(2) TEU, its history and the practice of the Court ofJustice, it is argued that the concept of 'national identities' under Article 4(2) TEU does not cover particular national conceptions offundamental rights, but admits that it may be difficult to make a clear separation between the more organizational or structural elements of national identity and their impact on the fundamental rights of individuals. The article then proceeds to look at national approaches, where fundamental rights tend to be included in the concept of constitutional identities to be protected by national courts. It is argued, however, that arguments based on constitutional identity under national law are not conducive for deciding cases on EU fundamental rights. Such identity claims operate as trump cards. Yet, there are other ways to accommodate diversity among the Member States in the area offundamental rights. If these are used and respected also by the Court ofJustice, unilateral recourse to constitutional identity is not needed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)517-535
Number of pages19
JournalEuropean Public Law
Volume27
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2021

Keywords

  • Constitutional Courts
  • Constitutional identity
  • EU
  • European Court
  • divergence
  • diversity
  • harmonization of fundamental rights protection
  • identity review
  • national choices
  • national diversity
  • protection of fundamental rights
  • reflections
  • REFLECTIONS
  • EUROPEAN COURT
  • CONSTITUTIONAL COURT
  • DIVERSITY

Cite this