Moving forward in carcinogenicity assessment: Report of an EURL ECVAM/ESTIV workshop

Raffaella Corvi*, Federica Madia, Kathryn Z. Guyton, Peter Kasper, Ruthann Rudel, Annamaria Colacci, Jos Kleinjans, Paul Jennings

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

There is an increased need to develop novel alternative approaches to the two-year rodent bioassay for the carcinogenicity assessment of substances where the rodent bioassay is still a basic requirement, as well as for those substances where animal use is banned or limited or where information gaps are identified within legislation. The current progress in this area was addressed in a EURL ECVAM- ESTIV workshop held in October 2016, in Juan les Pins. A number of initiatives were presented and discussed, including data-driven, technology driven and pathway-driven approaches. Despite a seemingly diverse range of strategic developments, commonalities are emerging. For example, providing insight into carcinogenicity mechanisms is becoming an increasingly appreciated aspect of hazard assessment and is suggested to be the best strategy to drive new developments. Thus, now more than ever, there is a need to combine and focus efforts towards the integration of available information between sectors. Such cross-sectorial harmonisation will aid in building confidence in new approach methods leading to increased implementation and thus a decreased necessity for the two-year rodent bioassay.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)278-286
Number of pages9
JournalToxicology in Vitro
Volume45
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2017
Event19th Meeting of the European-Society-of-Toxicology (ESTIV) - Juan Les Pins, France
Duration: 1 Oct 2016 → …

Keywords

  • Carcinogenicity
  • Alternative methods
  • Rodent bioassay
  • Toxicogenomics
  • Mechanisms
  • Cancer hallmarks
  • CTA
  • IN-VITRO
  • RISK-ASSESSMENT
  • CHEMICAL CARCINOGENICITY
  • ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICALS
  • IARC MONOGRAPHS
  • CANCER-RISK
  • GENOTOXICITY
  • ANIMALS
  • PROGRAM
  • MODEL

Cite this