Abstract
The aim of this study was to explore whether individual differences in executive function in undergraduate students ( n = 72) contribute to false recall and recognition as obtained with the Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm. Participants were subjected to the DRM paradigm and also were given a test designed to assess executive function--the Random Number Generation task (RNG). A relationship was found between heightened seriation on the RNG (indicating a deficiency in the ability to inhibit cognitive schemes) and false recognition of non-presented, critical lure words in the DRM paradigm. This suggests that individual differences in executive function do occur in a healthy population and that the reconstructive activity inherent in memory depends in part on executive functioning.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1065-1077 |
Journal | International Journal of Neuroscience |
Volume | 116 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2006 |