Microarrays as a diagnostic tool in prenatal screening strategies: ethical reflection

A. de Jong, W.J. Dondorp, M V E. Macville, C.E.M. de Die-Smulders, J.M.M. van Lith, G.M.W.R. de Wert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Genomic microarray analysis is increasingly being applied as a prenatal diagnostic tool. Microarrays enable searching the genome at a higher resolution and with higher sensitivity than conventional karyotyping for identifying clinically significant chromosomal abnormalities. As yet, no clear guidelines exist on whether microarrays should be applied prenatally for all indications or only in selected cases such as ultrasound abnormalities, whether a targeted or genome-wide array should be used, and what these should include exactly. In this paper, we present some ethical considerations on the prenatal use of microarrays. There is a strong consensus, at least in Western countries, that the aim of prenatal screening for foetal abnormalities should be understood as facilitating autonomous reproductive choice for prospective parents. The tests offered should be valid and useful to reach that purpose. Against this background, we address several ethical issues raised by the prenatal application of microarrays. First, we argue that the general distinction between a targeted and a genome-wide microarray needs to be scrutinised. Then we examine whether microarrays are 'suitable tests' to serve either a screening or a diagnostic purpose. Given the wide range of findings possibly generated by microarrays, the question arises whether microarrays actually promote or interfere with autonomous reproductive decision-making. Moreover, if variants of unknown clinical significance are identified, this adds to the burden and complexity of reproductive decision-making. We suggest a qualified use of microarrays in the prenatal context.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)163-172
JournalHuman Genetics
Volume133
Issue number2
Early online date28 Sep 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2014

Cite this