Abstract
This paper describes some practical epistemological, methodological, and ethical considerations, as well as shortcomings, in the efforts to decolonise research methodology in qualitative research. Through self-reflection, a critical component of qualitativeresearch, this paper utilises diary entries kept by the researcher during her Ph.D. studies to interrogate methodological decolonisation based on her experience conducting virtual qualitative interviews. By exploring four major themes underlying a researcher’s choice of data collection (epistemology, methodology, data collection methods, and ethics), this reflective piece underscores the importance of non-extractive ethics, recognising participants’ agency, and carefully navigating social hierarchies in building trust in researcher-participant relationships, regardless of data collection channels. The analysis contributes to the methodological decolonisation literature by highlighting practical experiences through reflective diary entries, enriching methodological decolonisation processes and outcomes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 216-237 |
| Journal | Qualitative Studies |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 2026 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Methodological decolonisation and local epistemologies: Practical insights from the field'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver