Methodological and interpretive concerns about Beemster et al.'s article 'The interpretation of change score of the pain disability index after vocational rehabilitation is baseline dependent': a letter to the editor

Laura Wilma Maria Elisabeth Beckers; Rob Johannes Elise Marie Smeets

doi:10.1186/s12955-020-01555-1

Methodological and interpretive concerns about Beemster et al.'s article 'The interpretation of change score of the pain disability index after vocational rehabilitation is baseline dependent': a letter to the editor

Laura Wilma Maria Elisabeth Beckers^*
, Rob Johannes Elise Marie Smeets

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

This is a critique of Beemster et al.'s article 'The interpretation of change score of the pain disability index after vocational rehabilitation is baseline dependent' (2018). The methodological issues in question include the choices of anchor to determine the minimal important change, and the intraclass correlation coefficient on which the calculation of the standard error of measurement was based. We believe these undermine the authors' interpretation.

Original language	English
Article number	301
Pages (from-to)	1-2
Number of pages	2
Journal	Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Volume	18
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01555-1
Publication status	Published - 7 Sept 2020

Keywords

Chronic musculoskeletal pain
Pain Disability Index
Minimal important change
Standard error of measurement
Smallest detectable change

Access to Document

10.1186/s12955-020-01555-1Licence: CC BY

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Methodological and interpretive concerns about Beemster et al.'s article 'The interpretation of change score of the pain disability index after vocational rehabilitation is baseline dependent': a letter to the editor'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Beckers, L. W. M. E., & Smeets, R. J. E. M. (2020). Methodological and interpretive concerns about Beemster et al.'s article 'The interpretation of change score of the pain disability index after vocational rehabilitation is baseline dependent': a letter to the editor. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 18(1), 1-2. Article 301. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01555-1

@article{4ed1b7e50131481db2c89f5661d50a9b,

title = "Methodological and interpretive concerns about Beemster et al.'s article 'The interpretation of change score of the pain disability index after vocational rehabilitation is baseline dependent': a letter to the editor",

abstract = "This is a critique of Beemster et al.'s article 'The interpretation of change score of the pain disability index after vocational rehabilitation is baseline dependent' (2018). The methodological issues in question include the choices of anchor to determine the minimal important change, and the intraclass correlation coefficient on which the calculation of the standard error of measurement was based. We believe these undermine the authors' interpretation.",

keywords = "Chronic musculoskeletal pain, Pain Disability Index, Minimal important change, Standard error of measurement, Smallest detectable change",

author = "Beckers, \{Laura Wilma Maria Elisabeth\} and Smeets, \{Rob Johannes Elise Marie\}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 The Author(s).",

year = "2020",

month = sep,

day = "7",

doi = "10.1186/s12955-020-01555-1",

language = "English",

volume = "18",

pages = "1--2",

journal = "Health and Quality of Life Outcomes",

issn = "1477-7525",

publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd",

number = "1",

}

Methodological and interpretive concerns about Beemster et al.'s article 'The interpretation of change score of the pain disability index after vocational rehabilitation is baseline dependent': a letter to the editor. / Beckers, Laura Wilma Maria Elisabeth; Smeets, Rob Johannes Elise Marie.
In: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, Vol. 18, No. 1, 301, 07.09.2020, p. 1-2.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methodological and interpretive concerns about Beemster et al.'s article 'The interpretation of change score of the pain disability index after vocational rehabilitation is baseline dependent'

T2 - a letter to the editor

AU - Beckers, Laura Wilma Maria Elisabeth

AU - Smeets, Rob Johannes Elise Marie

PY - 2020/9/7

Y1 - 2020/9/7

N2 - This is a critique of Beemster et al.'s article 'The interpretation of change score of the pain disability index after vocational rehabilitation is baseline dependent' (2018). The methodological issues in question include the choices of anchor to determine the minimal important change, and the intraclass correlation coefficient on which the calculation of the standard error of measurement was based. We believe these undermine the authors' interpretation.

AB - This is a critique of Beemster et al.'s article 'The interpretation of change score of the pain disability index after vocational rehabilitation is baseline dependent' (2018). The methodological issues in question include the choices of anchor to determine the minimal important change, and the intraclass correlation coefficient on which the calculation of the standard error of measurement was based. We believe these undermine the authors' interpretation.

KW - Chronic musculoskeletal pain

KW - Pain Disability Index

KW - Minimal important change

KW - Standard error of measurement

KW - Smallest detectable change

U2 - 10.1186/s12955-020-01555-1

DO - 10.1186/s12955-020-01555-1

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

C2 - 32894135

SN - 1477-7525

VL - 18

SP - 1

EP - 2

JO - Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

JF - Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

IS - 1

M1 - 301

ER -